See More

Less

Phantom of the Opera Reviews

  • Abigale 2022-07-05 21:46:26

    Just finished watching it...I think it's good

    After tidying up the storage room, I found that this DVD I bought a long time ago can still be put out. Not Webber's version of The Phantom of the Opera, but it seems to be doing a good job, so let's take a look. Prompt, the following are all spoilers after watching... Gide is almost overflowing,...

  • Leo 2022-07-05 20:51:19

    [Film Review] Phantom of the Opera (1943) 7.0/10

    Far more a romantic musical than a grisly horror, Universal's 1943 Technicolor remake of PHANTOM OF THE OPERA shares the same set of Rupert Julian's 1925 silent predecessor (starring Lon Chaney as the Phantom), directed by contract director Arthur Lubin, it is a costly production that brings all...

  • Ahmad 2022-07-05 19:35:59

    Phantom of the Opera in1943

    There are so many versions of The Phantom of the Opera, from movies to musicals, and film adaptations. It has to be said that each has its own merits. From the current point of view, the 1943 version must have some distance from the current aesthetic in terms of horror. The structure, rhythm,...

  • Laverne 2022-07-05 14:33:59

    1943

    ?Very unique adaptation, I think this version of The Phantom also has a lot of room for digging, a passionate suitor in his late 50s, a depressed but talented composer, trapped in poverty, hope He sought a way out through his own works, but he could not gain the approval of others, and even his...

  • Josefa 2022-07-05 13:12:01

    seemingly happy irony

    Just finished watching the 1943 version of The Phantom of the Opera. It's really nice that every character is alive. Although there are not many movies I have watched, I am willing to think more about the intentions of the screenwriter and director of each movie. The disfigured violinist was...

Phantom of the Opera

Director: Arthur Lubin

Language: English Release date: August 27, 1943