See More

Less

Cujo Reviews

  • Meagan 2022-10-01 20:51:27

    People in 1983 will have cardiopulmonary resuscitation, really ashamed

    Although I know that this movie was made quite early, it still shocked me in 1983. It’s not that the shot was so good at that time. After all, Stephen’s name is here, but that ordinary Americans of that era were able to master basic CPR and have relevant first aid knowledge. Because even if you...

  • Trace 2022-10-01 18:51:00

    Overall not very good, but St. Bernard’s performance is remarkable

    After watching the whole movie, I always feel that it is far-fetched. The first is the extramarital love of the heroine. In addition to adding a heavy atmosphere to the film, the only effect seems to be the stiffness of the husband and wife relationship that caused the husband to fail to repair the...

  • Reese 2022-10-01 17:11:04

    Dead woman and dog

    As a 1983 American horror film (older than me?), it should be given a cross-age objective evaluation! It’s better to call her a horror film than a feature film? A total of 93 minutes of film, it took more than 1/3 of the time to pave the way. Is this rhythm really in line with the rhythm of the...