Growing from a two-knife to an "expert" in criminal psychology, Holden was a little flirtatious, and his ego was inflated! Those who are engaged in psychology are not good at or dare not analyze themselves. Among the four, Holden is the weakest. His theoretical knowledge is not as good as that of female professors and girlfriends, and his practical experience is not as good as his fat colleagues. Therefore, he is eager to prove himself, even at the cost of Fall out with mates. In the process of research, he formed a set of his own investigation methods, using the identity of "similar people" to get close to criminals, to obtain the stories of criminals, to make them tell the truth, and to be proud of them until he got burned. But aren't Holden and the criminal really not the same kind of person? Or maybe they can talk together because they have something in common in essence. This is not a so-called psychological strategy. If you want to talk about psychological warfare, Ed Campbell is really much better than him. The cases selected this season seem to be related to mothers. Although not everyone agrees with Freud's childhood shadow, we have to admit that childhood has a decisive impact on everyone. As said in the play, why the father's influence is so low, one is because "isn't the father missing in the first place?" Another reason is because these perverted murderers are all male, except for the perverted criminals who are more male. In addition, the mother's influence on the child (boy) will be greater during the growth process. . . In addition, Debbie is an excellent woman in all aspects, Holden should cherish it, or do you really want her and the female professor to become soulmates?
View more about Mindhunter reviews
