That being the case, the impression score for this film will definitely be a little higher. It is criticized for being uncreative and completely copied, so we can't see it; maybe if you watch the original version first, you will deduct a lot of points for the film. After all, in terms of subject matter, the first time I saw it was quite fresh, and a good selection of pseudo-documentaries would be very attractive.
It should be said that the people in this house are like zombies, but medical principles are like rabies. Such treatment is closer to real life. After all, zombies are things in horror movies, not real, and rabies does exist. Once it becomes ill, it will bite people, and the mortality rate is very high. Of course, because of the plot needs, the speed of infection has also increased, and the treatment of the disease has been exaggerated.
All the shots in the film are from the camera of one of the characters. No matter where the scene is, there is only one angle of view. This is a feature of a pseudo-documentary, creating a sense of reality as much as possible, so that the audience and the characters in the film breathe and frighten at the same time. Due to the limited angle of view, a lot of uncertainty is added, and the danger next to the lens is often suddenly presented; and for the purpose of simulation, the lens changes quickly, which does not give you too much opportunity to discover clues or truth, so that suspense and shock can be removed Keep it till the end.
Only in the end I found the monster in the attic, and had to use night vision goggles to find the way. This scene is very familiar, but I just can’t remember where I saw it. Who can help me to answer ==!
View more about Quarantine reviews
