First look at the interview rules:
1. Do not talk to the invigilator or guards.
2. Do not leave the interview room
. 3. Do not damage the answer papers
-offenders will be disqualified.
The interviewer left after a few words, leaving a bewildered job applicant. Even more tragic, they found a blank on the examination paper! What kind of thing is this? The interviewer played a guessing game after finally fighting all the way through the battle. And how did the protagonists of our tragedy react? After a short silence, he began to look for answers: the interviewer obviously would not be idle and boring to entertain them, he must have a deep meaning in doing so. Therefore, they further concluded: This test must be to test a certain ability of ours-it may be teamwork ability, or it may be insight; it may also be the ability to cooperate; or it may be resistance to blows and so on. This provides our classmates with a way of thinking, that is, when you are facing a seemingly "unreasonable" interview, don't rush to complain that the interviewer is "abnormal", "does not understand the interview", "can you ask about professional points? The question is"...After all, it is useless to complain about the interview. The important thing is to think about the meaning of the other party's doing this, and make a correct judgment. You must know that HR is also paid. For the so-called loyalty to the king, HR also wants to find an ideal candidate. Otherwise, if you find an uncle who can't integrate into the company group if you don't do bad things, it will be HR himself that will be tragic. When it comes to HR's own job problems, they can't be too tricky. So no matter what questions HR asks and what interview method you choose, there is one and only one purpose: to find a suitable person for this position. Therefore, the best way to pursue the deep meaning of a specific question is to understand what qualities the position requires, and follow this direction, I believe you will not be too far away from the answer.
In addition, "understanding the company's background" is actually very important for interviews. Otherwise, the few people who know part of the company's information will not hide it, and Brown will not torture the dark who knows the company's background best, because they know the company's background and are inevitably more than just being tempted by high salaries and good benefits. Several people who don't even know the company's background have an advantage and can better understand the thoughts of their superiors.
Write a small summary here. In fact, the interview is not that complicated. What HR is looking for is not the best person, but the most suitable person. So all you have to do is to strive to become the most suitable person. To meet this condition, you need to be prepared in advance. ——Understand the company's background and the company's requirements for the position. Of course, one of the most important prerequisites for all this is that you are really suitable for this job, not just for the so-called "transition", "employ first and then choose a job" and just find a job that you don't like and unsuitable for.
View more about Exam reviews
