Literary too literary

I don’t know if I want to be the kid in the emperor’s new clothes. I don’t have any theory about watching movies. I know a lot of actors, so I can’t name them, and I don’t remember the director’s history. I’m currently at the fancier stage. Compared with himself, I like Woody Allen's last film "End Point" more. Woody Allen is too smart, and the audience does not have a sense of superiority over the film's intelligence when watching the film. After this layer of enjoyment is deprived, There are two perspectives left: looking up and looking up; Woody Ellen's thoughts are actually more grassroots in the last point. He tells the story of a man who got rid of the temptation of desire and deliberately entered the upper class. The Hollywood structure of this story is generally men. In the face of money status and true love, he chose love and took his beloved woman to wander; and Woody Ellen made a black joke, or a postmodern interpretation of love, then of course men will not only talk about love and Abandoning the princess, and the princess is beautiful, cute and considerate, and the woman who represents love is full of lust and possession, as well as a destructive co-incineration complex; fate has given this man a chance again and again, and finally let him live peacefully among the crony. Woody Allen gives men a grassroots resonance and sympathy, the so-called compassion because they understand; and VIcky and Cristina, in my opinion, are Woody Allen's interpretation of women. His last point analysis is A relatively popular man, and this film interprets two very small women. Of course, in the director's living environment, these two women are the representatives of most women, rational and emotional, from the character image, I I think Crisitina and Anthony (the names are so mainstream). Cristina is too vain. Even when Johnson plays, I'm tired of her. She never knows what she wants, only what she doesn't want. This is a very poetic The premise, but it is difficult to express clearly, her choice of Anthony is full of accidental and artificial traces, because Anthony can be any provocative man, so what is between them? appreciate each other? Or the love between two men and women with artistic temperament that we laymen can't understand? Vicky's husband is right, Cristina's purpose is too unclear, her microcosm is too weak; Anthony, like her, has no charm at all. When I watched it, I really admired how he dared to strike up a conversation with a woman. Courage, the inspiration for the paintings mostly comes from his wife, I have serious doubts about his charm index; Vicky has changes and struggles in his heart, this is a play, Anthony's jealous wife is genius and emotional, emotional, and it is also the point of the explosion , Anthony's father was a poet who would appreciate women's misanthropy, only Anthony and cris Tina seems to be too far-fetched. She claims to be rich in emotion, but she can't capture it. It's not impressive, and it's too conceptual. Or some people say that this is a film about women, so it is also about men. I prefer Anthony's wife, which is one of the positive solutions I think of as a woman; VIcky is also good, but not new; I am very cold about the literary elements implanted in the film, literature, photography, painting, poetry, but I am looking forward to a film Movies are not literature and art literacy. If you watch too many bad movies, the language will be more forgiving. After all, this is a qualified work. I can only say one sentence: literature and art are too literary and art.

View more about Vicky Cristina Barcelona reviews