At the end of the video, I prayed for a miracle. Hopefully when Dunbar negotiates with big men, tell them that Sioux Indians are harmless and kind.
But it's just an extravagance. Some beautiful things can only be regretted after they are destroyed. Suddenly I thought of a sentence I read in the book before: the villain is greedy for profit and bears shame, and it is difficult to get rid of it; the gentleman is pure and righteous, and when he is depressed, he retires. While inappropriate, it seems to be the case. Kind people are always criticized, while villains are always arrogant.
Americans are finally ungrateful. In the English class, the teacher said that the Indians taught the British how to survive in North America, but after they settled down, they caused the Indians to suffer genocide.
People's hearts are too easily bewitched by desires, making people look fierce.
I remember when I was reading a film review, someone said that this kind of "treason" heroism was unacceptable, but I want to say that this still doesn't explain the problem? Isn't the author's dissatisfaction expressed clearly enough? Because you are wrong! "Avatar" is too dreamy and naive compared to it, and it also shows that even if you understand everything, you can't prevent people from committing crimes.
... After all, people always want to live a good life.
View more about Dances with Wolves reviews
