What's wrong with religion?

I was mentally prepared for the "sequel to the curse" and watched some discussions. What makes movie fans unacceptable is nothing more than the combination of zombie films and religious complexes. Being deceived and filled with righteous indignation, it's like a group of developing teenagers secretly hiding in a small black room to collectively receive the enlightenment of sex education. They thought it was the lively seafood of Europe, America, South Korea, and Japan. As a result, the heroine has not shown her arms yet, and the black screen sounded the voice-over of the aunt of the neighborhood committee: "Love is..." I fuck, it turned out to be "Newlyweds Education"!

What happened to "Rec2"? It's nothing more than not meeting the psychological expectations of some cult fans watching zombie movies. There is a discussion and it’s good, “I don’t understand those people who say that zombie movies are nothing new and disgusting. They are so creative now, and they say nothing is real.” I think the most important thing in the movie is the storytelling and the way of telling stories. Logic and structure are satisfactory. "Rec2" is still full of blood, and there are many highlights of the "Sky Monkey" headshot; the structural change from a single perspective of pseudo-recording to multiple perspectives is also an innovation. Of course, I personally don't like this innovation, because it inevitably makes Movie fans feel that artificial technology is handled, pseudo-documentaries use multiple shots, and editing are all flaws; but don’t they still need to complain in terms of satisfying common sense and satisfying personal logic? After all, the movie has to be romanticized. Those who are interested can look at the photos and resumes of the perverted killers in reality. Most of them are weak and bookish. How can there be a literary and jazzy like Freddy? Powerful. Who loves to watch it on the screen intact.

What's wrong with religion? Is the logic of religion combined with zombie broken? But every zombie type film must be closely related to biotechnology? Zombie films attract attention because they have a certain basis in reality, and there are many conspiracy theories to catch the wind and shadows. The "Rec" series can hardly escape the deadlock. It is nothing more than the carrier of the virus is blood. However, today, science and religion do not share the same heavens, and science has developed into the largest religion: everything that opposes me is wrong, it is superstition, others are hell, quantum mechanics will judge everything in the world, and anyone who doesn’t believe in me Must be thrown into other dimensions.... Familiar lines. (As a pseudo-nerd these days, you are embarrassed to say hello to people without mentioning quantum mechanics and dimensional space.)

The priest nailed the zombies with the cross and chanted the scriptures. It is indeed a different way, but it is not impossible to justify it. Let me "sophistry" for "Rec2": It can be understood that religion more affects the spiritual level. The role of religion does not mention fetishism and supernatural phenomena, but more restricts people and provides motivation. For example, the legendary hero mother who lifted a ton truck with her bare hands to rescue her son under the wheel, you must have scientific evidence to start your research from neurons and muscle plexus, but where did the spiritual motivation come from? It is explained in "Rec1" that the underwear mm in the attic was secretly studied by the Vatican church personnel. I was abused by the uniform department since I was a child, and I am still talking about reading the Bible every day. When I grow up, I will definitely have a psychological shadow. So the appearance is the struggle between religion and the devil, and the inner is the psychological mind control sm.

ps: Some time ago, some people in the "Science Squirrel Club" discussed the relics, which attracted a magic stick to preach and give lectures. Of course, a group of scientific teenagers slobbered. But there is no lack of pertinent ones, and the general idea is as follows: I myself study Buddhism, but Buddhism promotes the correct outlook on life and values, and the thing that I most oppose is fetishism. But as long as there is a relic, there must be a chemical cause. In ancient times, the people of the poor were buried in burials, and only high-ranking religious figures could be cremated, so it is not surprising that something different from ordinary people appeared. However, the fire source of modern cremation is no longer the ancient grass-leaf branches. It is directly separated by charcoal fire, and there are not many formations. You can get several batches of samples of the ashes of ordinary people, and conduct experiments according to different experimental environment, temperature, ratio of plant ash and other factors. As long as there are real relics, they will definitely be formed.

View more about [Rec]² reviews