Check it out then.
Videos about snipers seem to be rare. It is difficult for these hunters who are as calm as a stone to interpret stories with clear layers and intense conflicts. Killing or being killed, there is destined helplessness and dullness in the cruelty. It seems that they can only be used as supporting characters in war stories to take care of the protagonist's wisdom and courage. global spirit.
In "Saving Private Ryan", my favorite is the sniper who recites "Old Testament*Psalms" when aiming for his prey. I think he has a kind of cold beauty. As a film devoted to the duel of these sharpshooters on the battlefield, "Soldier Under the City" will certainly arouse my great interest.
The summary is as follows:
1. The film is a success, very enjoyable to watch, at least it describes a simple story tactfully and vividly; the performances of the actors are also in place.
2. I can't see that this film actually cost 90 million US dollars, but I can't see any waste of scene special effects.
3. The French director's aura is not suitable for shooting the kind of grand war and sci-fi themes. Lu Besson's "The Fifth Element" is also a lesson.
4. Some critics believe that the film has a strong ideological tendency and demonizes the Soviet army. It's funny how what I see as truth turns out to be a lie or even a conspiracy to others.
5. The superb shooting skills of the soldiers in the film are not from military training but from civilian training. Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty had considered banning the use of bows and arrows, but a minister later refuted it by citing Confucian classics, and Prime Minister Gongsun Hongcai gave up this stupid suggestion.
6. It seems that the major European powers really only have to unite to confront the Hollywood forces. Is it necessary to adjust the cooperation structure of the director from France, the actors from the UK, and the funds from Germany?
Evaluation is complete. It is indeed a colorful New Year's holiday!
View more about Enemy at the Gates reviews
