The story prototypes of the two films are relatively similar. In the event of sudden danger, the crew team led by the captain rescued the air disaster with the lowest loss of undead by virtue of the rare luck of calm mentality and superb skills. Due to the high speed of the aircraft, the occurrence and disposal time of the event is relatively short, and the audience is very clear about the ending of the event, so for the film, how to create suspense and drama is the most difficult point.
There are two differences. In terms of narrative, the American film is obviously superior, and the focus of the story is on the analysis of the responsibility after the event, which creates suspense, and the short 208-second event process is placed in the analysis of this accident. In the process, the drama was added to avoid the straightforward narrative. It seems more logical to say that the middle film was shot in the first American film after the filming. The same theme film has absorbed the experience of the previous work and adopted a more exciting narrative, rather than the opposite. In terms of the presentation of the story, the content of the Chinese machine is richer, the characters are more, the conflicts are more intense, and there is a reason why the event itself takes longer, but the addition of factors such as cloud and weather creates more viewing experience.
Another point is that the Chinese aircraft is full of praise to the captain and the crew, while the Saji is a reflection on accident analysis. I support a dialectical view of the problem. There are no perfect things and no perfect people in the world, only comprehensive talents. more real and alive
View more about Sully reviews
