Sure enough, it is one of the classic texts for the "first taste" of the psychoanalytic school (I must point out that I like "inception" but it is only an in-depth discussion of the structure of dream space rather than the psychoanalytic phenomenon of dreams). Freund's school of psychoanalysis has been used as the theoretical basis for dialogue therapy and the main scientific source of contemporary psychological counseling and therapy since its birth. The second film semiotics constituted by the psychoanalytic phenomenon of filmmakers. I must admit that I am addicted to the complex plot of the film, but the "last minute rescue" mode of Hollywood blockbusters must "return to the original shape" of every moviegoer who is similar to me - Julie or Sophia, this It doesn't matter, what matters is that everything is a reflection of the childhood and reality in the dream, and it is the backlash of the strong Oedipus complex. The director must know that it will be far-fetched and even embarrassing to put Freund's complex and boring theoretical structure in such a so-called love story. (Even finally arranged for Tom to face the camera directly and reveal the camera that should have been perfectly hidden) The whole film realized the perfect "snake bite" of the text, before and after the screen, the director and the audience. tail". At the end of the film, whether the choice made by the male protagonist is conscious or sublime is the least important thing in this film. Everyone will choose reality, but the distinction between reality and dreams is like a brain in a vat. Metaphors generally contradict each other.
View more about Vanilla Sky reviews
