[Comments] Mentioning "Silence of the Lambs" often mentions feminism, but all keen feminists simply disdain the female discourse that seems to be charity. If we call the era of male sex a progressive sign of feminism, then the prequel of the Lambs, Red Dragon, may be more based on the spectrum of feminism, with Ralph Fiennes' "impassioned" body display, Edward Norton's ambiguous relationship with Anthony Hopkins The performance of the film can be seen as a concession of men's right to peep. Although the producer cruelly blinded the only important woman in the film, the woman's climate can not play any symbolic and representative role, but kills people. Kuang is crazy and perverted because of the ugliness (ugly?) brought about by disfigurement, as if being watched beautifully is his greatest value in life, and men don't have to care so much about appearance. Or cannibal doctor is quite high, and he simply eats the "favorite" object. The food is also sexual, and the old man's food is irrelevant. The performance of Hopkins and Norton hurting each other is more like the entanglement of showing love. I think for tens of thousands of years. The relationship between a man and a woman is nothing more than playing tricks in this kind of reasoning, so although some people ridicule feminism as just women who don't shave their legs, feminism just wants to stand in this game. Hopkins instead of Norton's position, this battle is not high or low, only strong and weak.
【Art Index】★★☆ 【Innovation Index】★★★ 【Recommendation Index】★★★★☆
View more about Red Dragon reviews
