If the Alien Contract is not linked with its predecessors and is presented separately, he is a bad movie

Garrick 2022-04-22 07:01:06

Holiday again.

Even a full day of rain on June 17 didn't stop my love for movies. It directly led me to watch this movie, which was not well-received in the circle of friends, when I saw that it was not too late after doing some serious work.

If you are a serious taste lover, I do not recommend this movie.

I was embarrassed that I was laughed at when I asked the conductor for 3D eyes at the theater. Even more indignant can not understand, this kind of film is not born for 3D? Of course maybe I'm a douchebag, all the films before this are 2D but I don't know.

(If that's the case, then fine, I'll... rant about all the Alien series!)

Second, about the 6 minutes of deletion, it also affected the pleasure of watching movies for a lot of heavy-duty fans.

Closer to home, now let's talk about this film in earnest.

(ps: Before watching The Covenant, I didn't watch any of its prequels. So everything I'm going to talk about next will only revolve around this Covenant)

The beginning of the story was a ship accident. Due to the energy shock caused by the opening of the energy sail during the driving process, 49 colonists and the only captain were killed and injured on the entire spaceship. Then, in order to avoid the situation of leaderless dragons, The position was extended to a pick-up man.

That's it.

Not only did he lead the small expedition team that landed next (for the principle that the heroine will not die, only the heroine survived), but he also chose to listen to him tell stories when he could kill David with one shot. , as well as the major task that triggers the plot of Piranha.

Is it really good for the director to weaken the IQ of the characters in order to promote the plot? Captain, didn't your mother teach you not to believe bad people when you were a kid? Uh...sorry I was wrong, you don't have a mother at all.

Therefore, the focus of the painting and the setting of the characters are unreasonable.

Usually, a movie needs to tell a story in 2 hours, and it must be told wonderfully, and the occurrence of that segment must be reasonable and fully drain its value.

The setting of the captain in the film is unreasonable. He is not able to carry the time wasted for him in the film, and he spends a lot of time describing the complaints of the crew against him after he authorizes him, but he does not give a reasonable explanation. It was wiped out with one stroke, and later died aggrievedly under David's hands. This kind of person deserves to be stupid. What do you want him for? This is far worse than the tragic and tragic death of every character in biochemistry that is meaningful and has faith. The captain's death was caused by his own stupidity.

At this time, I really want to ask the director, you have spent so much time on this character, is it really worthwhile to die like this? Is it really good not to lie to a tear or two?

However, our big director is not only doing this to the male supporting character, but the female lead is still the same.

Conservative protests at the beginning of the change of course later put David on board. Danny's high and low IQ at that time was really a feast for my eyes. Only the villain is his own. Danny's IQ that has been soaring all the way has finally turned into a Thai who has been only talking about love at the moment he met the villain. Dee? (Sorry, I always think that women in love will have lower IQs.) The main reason is that this teddy doesn't know his spouse yet. Lamenting that your spouse lost the hand for you is really worthless, no one can recognize it.

But it's not her fault. After all, no one could have imagined that the spouse who hanged David at the beginning would continue to be deceived by David. Or maybe this is someone deliberately letting David go?

Well, in the end, after the collective IQ of the protagonist and supporting actors dropped, David successfully mastered the control of the spaceship and the custody of the embryo.

There are too many five-star reviews in film reviews, and most of them say that the director digs and fills holes, and the logic is very good.

But a really good movie, even if taken out on its own, is excellent. It can have unclear clues, and the audience can't understand some of the stalks, but if all the characters in the film are set unreasonably, and the plot is promoted in order to promote the plot, it is really meaningless.

Why can't the film be made better while filling the hole? Why should the film be bound and scored? Bad is bad. We don't spend dozens of dollars just to watch you fill the holes one by one. The whole film does not have any opponents who can compete with David, and the road is smooth. It also allows the audience to have a tired viewing experience of "David will not die and can do anything" during the viewing.

3 stars can't be more.

View more about Alien: Covenant reviews

Extended Reading

Alien: Covenant quotes

  • Oram: What do you believe in, David?

    David: Creation.

  • Daniels: You hear that?

    Oram: What?

    Daniels: Nothing. No birds, no animals. Nothing.