Note 2: When it comes to key plots, it is strongly recommended to watch the movie
first. "Science" people can be called evil scientists.
So what is evil science? Basically, those scientific categories that violate human ethics are all. The problem is that certain issues are too tempting, and the invisible shackles of ethics are not only constrained The experimental form and the restraint of the mind... I personally feel that those who are serious about research have a yearning for evil science in their hearts... Then
again, because the human relationship involves "humans" and even animals, so relatively speaking, Biology, biochemistry, psychology (including brain neuroscience, etc.) are particularly easy to involve evil science (for example, the black magic of the magical world, which will only become more and more attractive as your knowledge increases). But like physics Learning this kind of hard science, you can still make something anti-social and anti-human at will.
*The following spoilers, eye-catching*
--------------------- -------------------------------------------------- --------------
Back to the movie, it's basically about two biologists messing up with various genes, the link of human genes collapsed, and a monster was created. The last thing the family was ruined. Although there are no heavy tastes on the screen, it is ethically thought-provoking, and the nausea appears from time to time as the film progresses (ethical heavy taste). The actor fucked the monster and later the monster was transformed into a sex. The two episodes of the man raped the heroine are really climax... (I won't say anything more important...)
----------------- -------------------------------------------------- ------------------
*Spoiler finished*
Back to the main content, from the mistakes made by the two scientists in the film, what can we as researchers learn?
As a study of evil science, there must be dangers. If we do the following, basically There is nothing wrong.
0, the most important point is that it
is a great spirit not to experiment with yourself for the sacrifice of science, but to experiment with yourself is the least reliable, stupid, and least scientific, especially if you do It’s still a high-risk evil science. Although the protagonist does not directly experiment with himself in the movie, he uses his own genes after all. In any case, the less intersection between the subject and himself, the better.
1,
Be rational. What is it? Rationality? Simply put, it is the binary 0 and 1. When should you stop the experiment, when should you do something, don’t hesitate, don’t use a vague intermediate state. The test item is out of control, and you should end it decisively, don’t keep your hands.
2, Always leave the back
door What is the back door? You have absolute control over the whole thing. For example, in the film, either leave a neurotoxin capsule in the brain of the test object, or get a special electrode to uniform the test object.
3, don’t be right Sympathy for the test subject
includes other emotions (anger, sadness, etc.). The mouse is a mouse. Insert the electrode when it is time to plug in the electrode, and stimulate it when it is time to stimulate. Don't have emotions about it. Basically all the tragedies in the film are It is caused by emotions towards the test product.
4,
It is unreliable to use a voice recorder to record the various data carefully and carefully , and there is no routine test for blood samples. Better
5, when quantifying various indicators
to stimulate the test product, you must quantify the indicators, otherwise statistical testing cannot be performed. This kind of experimenter in the film personally communicates with the test product (and also very blind + emotional), it is easy to cause Experimenter effect
6, safety first
Life is the most important thing. Don’t relax your vigilance and equip yourself at any time. This is more difficult, after all, you are secretly doing everything yourself.
7, The preliminary experiment should be done well in the
lecture. The protagonist didn’t realize that related problems would reappear. It’s too unreliable.
8, Always use burning (specially for biochemical scientific research)
to bury the test product!!! You’re kidding. Look, finally all It's all dead...
9, (just take it for granted)
If you cooperate with the military, then the 4\5\6\8 above is not a problem.
Do the above, congratulations, you are not far from a qualified (evil) scientist Up!
------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------
Finally a few words, the director Vincenzo Natali's things are highly recommended, The Cube he directed is on my top 10. The other Cypher / Company Man is also very good. There is also nothing I haven’t seen~ He is not a prolific director, but he makes things pretty weird =.=
View more about Splice reviews
