Shanzhai film, can you talk about some logic?

I heard that this is a copycat film. The copycat is "Crisis", which made the latter's original name "The Fall of the White House" unusable. I haven't seen "Crisis", but I heard that the scene of this film is still the same. No, the protagonist is Gerard Butler, who plays the muscular king Leonidas among the 300 Spartans, and Morgan Freeman, who is a veteran actor, should be guaranteed in terms of acting skills, but After reading it, I feel that the above two points are true. The scene is big enough. Half of the White House was blown up, and light and heavy weapons such as AC-130 air gunboats, fighter jets, Black Hawk helicopters, and SEALs were also used. The acting skills are also passable, but the logic of the plot is really annoying. You say that you have a bit of sincerity in a copycat film, okay? Don't just focus on the big scene of the copycat, and the screenwriter should put some effort into the plot!
Point 1: Excuse me, how did the AC-130 air gunboat get acquired by North Korean terrorists? It cost more than 100 million to build. So far, only 43 have been produced, so it can be easily acquired by terrorists? This is not a passenger plane can also engage in hijacking or something. Even if they worked so hard to get one, how did they fly over the White House? Is American air control so weak? And what was the role of the "air death god" that took so much effort to get? Forcing the President of the United States into the bunker? Kill some civilians? Kill a few White House security guards? Finally got shot down by a fighter? Come on, North Korean terrorists, the cost of playing is too high!
Tucao point 2: The Baogong security system, which is known as the most anti-counterfeiting in the world, was easily solved by 40 North Korean terrorists within 13 minutes. I don’t even bother to complain. After all, the plot requires it. But since the sticks are so powerful, why does one protagonist kill almost all the stick elites? (Rough estimate, 40 sticks, 12 died in the battle against the White House, the other 2 died in the helicopter, and the remaining 26 were all KOed by the protagonist, including the traitor, it is really fierce, it is simply the White House version Rambo!) What's the use of the White House's annual security expenses? It's enough to raise a few more savage protagonists!
Tucao point 3: In order to highlight the heroism of the protagonist, the American troops in the film, including the special forces and the White House security guards are all weak, but the most puzzling thing is that the protagonist in the film rescued the son of the president of the United States and escaped from the sewer of the White House. They escaped, and the special forces responded, and the terrorists did not find out. Then, since the president's son can escape from the White House from here, why can't the special forces sneak into the White House from here to assist the protagonist? It is necessary to send seals to the White House with great fanfare. It is no wonder that five of them will be shot down. The US military is expected to cry miserably for the loss of so many seals.
Tucao point 4: The biggest flaw I personally feel is the program of the Cerberus self-destruction system. The password of the self-destruction system is in the hands of the President, the Secretary of Defense, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Since the password is so important, these three people should not get together. This is not without precedent. One of the cabinet members did not attend the inauguration ceremony of the President of the United States, because he was afraid that at this important moment, the leader would be wiped out, and the connection will replace it. There are no candidates. Even Coca-Cola knows this. The formula is in the hands of three people. Three people cannot go out at the same time, let alone walk together. That is to prevent the leakage of the formula. Leaving that aside, the reason why the president asked the secretary of defense and the chairman of the joint council to give the password is to save their lives, and he is convinced that he can't give the password, so the terrorists can't succeed, and the sticks are going to tie the president for this The son just wanted to threaten the president to say the password, but in the end the system actually started, that is to say, the president said the password, but the video did not explain why the president said the password. The image has made a 180-degree turn! Since you can tell the password, why go to tie someone's son?

View more about Olympus Has Fallen reviews