The whole film feels a bit like The Lion King, but this time the lion does not appear in the animal film, which is quite rare, maybe because it is the background setting of the jungle instead of the prairie? Because it is in the jungle, the tiger naturally becomes the king of the mountain, and there seem to be very few films where the tiger becomes the villain. The plot is also the story of a villain who kills the protagonist's elders, and then the protagonist travels to make friends and grow up, and finally kill the villain's story, especially when the song of bear necessities appeared, it completely gave me a kind of vision of Hakuna Matata. Feeling, I haven't seen the animated version before, I know this song was heard at the Christmas party of the Institute in Germany, and then my colleague explained the song to me. The animated version is a very cheerful song, but it feels okay in the movie. In addition, I also found that the singing scene of this little actor is a little awkward. When he sings, he doesn't look cheerful but has a rock and roll flavor.
The film as a whole still has a strong taste of children's books. The purpose of education is greater than the story itself. It is indeed a story that is very suitable for educating children. There are many elements such as courage, family, hands-on thinking and even fire prevention and fire prevention, and they are appropriate. The description of death is also to the point, the depiction of the strength between animals and the relationship between the food chain is not true, whether the tiger can kill the wolves and bears is still a question mark, the tiger threatens the wolves The part is great, but it actually uses Waiting for the child by waiting for the rabbit is to give the child a chance to grow up. The educational significance of this film is somewhat greater than the story background and plot shaping of the film itself. The so-called wolf clan rules in the whole film are obviously problematic. The wolf clan obviously drove the children away for their own safety. This is not abandoning their companions. And to protect the selfish behavior of the so-called family? Even a member can't be protected, what's the use of those few words? And it was easily occupied by tigers. Well, if it is the plan proposed by the Black Panther, it can really get the best of both worlds. The setting of the Black Panther is really cool, and there are also settings that describe him running faster than the tiger. The little wolf is so cute, it's just a little husky, can a female wolf be the leader? The gorilla immediately recognized Walken, and his song felt more fun than bear necessities, and it was repeated at the end of the credits. Scarlett's snake looks very mysterious, but there is some soy sauce, maybe it's just to elicit the funniest and cutest bear in the film. Bill once again plays a fun and playful role, and the bear's face modeling also gives people a sense of The feeling of being lazy, and the strength of the bear should be one of the best in the forest. The setting of the elephant is also too great, it is like the god of the forest, and as a result, he basically did not speak. What's interesting is that the monkeys that are closest to humans in this film basically don't speak, only the big orangutan can speak, and the setting is too King Kong.
Think about it, in fact, each animal is the adult role of a child when he grows up. The black panther is the biological father, strict and most concerned about the child, the mother wolf is the gentle mother, the wolves are the school environment, and the bear is the most casual of the relatives. The most accessible uncle, the gorilla is the relative who is more mercenary. I guess it will be the role of the bear in the future. . .
View more about The Jungle Book reviews
