The director moved the scene from an 18th-century middle-class manor to a 20th-century rural peasant life. No, I’m not against the modernization of famous novels, but I’m against the director arbitrarily tampering with the original in the name of realism, without borrowing Austin’s stories and dialogues. Look, the director came to make a movie without reading the original! "Director Joe White, who won a BAFTA Television Award for Charles II: The Power & the Passion, said bluntly: 'I've never read Pride and Prejudice or the TV series adaptation. '" Kate, a girl who is a little wild and a little laissez-faire. At the age of 20, she is more than beautiful, but she is not smart enough to be a girl spoiled by a prominent family, but she can't play the insight and dignity of Xiaojiabiyu. This movie almost let me down with her. Only two roles, Jane and Cousin Collins, were cast.
To be honest, I am not tolerant enough. I cannot tolerate the Elizabeth family in the yard like village women with pigs and dogs flying in groups of chickens and ducks. I cannot tolerate the prom in the film as messy and crowded as a small wine shop. I cannot tolerate Kate’s random bangs and bangs. Her father came out with a stern wig and couldn't stand the lack of etiquette in 18th-century interviews and dialogues. Remakes, these necessary reproductions of etiquette and scenes are respect for the original and more respect for themselves.
There is nothing classic about leaving the arrogance and prejudice of the 18th century - letting Baodai and Baodai sit in the dormitory and chatting on the Internet doesn't sound appealing. Even if it is love, say all the words to another person again, if it is not the same person in that year and place, it is nothing more than reading in front of the mirror and entertaining oneself.
View more about Pride & Prejudice reviews
