On the other hand, Jerusalem, a city known for its religion, is also struggling between Islam and Christianity.
Both Islam and the Christians want to take him back, they want to start war, but the King of Jerusalem and our hero both feel that two religions can coexist peacefully, and through the balance of power, peace can be maintained.
However, under the threat of Christian fanatics, the war between the two countries broke out again, and Jerusalem changed hands, but the people were not injured, but retreated safely. What I wonder is whether this people-based anti-religious pacifism was effective against the oppressive citizens of Salem at that time.
The truth is, it works. This man who had lost his faith in Christ had many companions.
Pope, wars of religion are always anti-religion. However, our male protagonist, the blacksmith, also likes sovereignty and cannot give it to others. Hence the final national war.
The whole movie is a little bit of a face, and it's in place. It's three hours long, and it's not rushed. Everything that needs to be said has been said. Americans will not like it, because it is anti-religion, and the image of Muslims is normal. Liberal elites will love this myth, this sad, romantic and liberating myth.
What impressed me most was the wise leper king of Jerusalem. He is under the mask, ruling a city-state, with a blank face to all the fanatical beliefs, this is the charm of the king.
The male protagonist, too much like the image of a romantic prince, is a bit distorted. Politicians should not be, this is a poet, a fanatic on the battlefield, but definitely not a master negotiator. And here, he did it.
There is still peace in Jerusalem, because of the fanaticism of the faith, everyone is eager to take him as their own, as if this is the best service to God. How the passion of faith is not transformed into the passion of violence, this is the biggest doubt raised by this film,
View more about Kingdom of Heaven reviews
