Whistleblower

Kacie 2022-01-03 08:01:44

After reading the comments of some netizens, they claimed that the film was ugly, and basically only lasted more than ten minutes. The dialogue flow film is a test of people's eyesight. You cannot clearly grasp the direction of the movie through static pictures and dynamic movements. You can only restore the plot itself through expressions, expressions, language, actions, and scene changes.
Some people say they don’t understand. This is also easy to understand. We are not native Americans. Some allusions in the movie, some irony of current events, some ridicules of hot spots, and some insights into business rules are difficult to resonate without being in the middle of the game. There are also some metaphorical symbols related to religious history, even if you want to break your scalp, you will not understand it. Therefore, it is considered qualified to understand two of the ten jokes in an American comedy,
but it is obvious that the film is not a pure comedy, and its core is actually very heavy. But the director, the great Stephen Soderbergh, is a master in cutting. He weakened many elements common in this type of film. Such as meticulous and insidious planning, intense and exciting evidence collection, intertwined psychology, and thrilling pursuit, etc., he has all taken care of.
The protagonist in the film, the seemingly sincere and innocent Mark who plays with everything, should have been a character with a super IQ but a gloomy mentality, a cold face and a cruel face. In many cases, his appearance has caused a strong comedy effect or obvious absurdity. It doesn't seem to be the ultimate villain, but a clown. Of course, in the second half of the film, Mark’s various behaviors have fully demonstrated that this good man has given his company and the law enforcement agencies a great embarrassment.
It seems that it is difficult for you to understand a person through a film with obvious tendencies. Or, this is exactly what the creators are deliberately emphasizing. Mark does not seem to be a three-dimensional existence in this film. When he doesn't seem to panic, he always looks so simple and innocent. Even if the lies are exposed, even if he goes to jail, he will take care of his life well. He is unscrupulous in his actions, tells lies and talks without changing his appearance.
The director doesn't seem to want everyone to explore too much about Mark's mentality and what forces have led to his series of behaviors. It just uses an exaggerated and absurd way to show everyone one side of his character. The film only vaguely suggests that Mark's behavior itself should be a manifestation of the greatest egoism. To this end, he can abandon all moral fetters, put down all the baggage, and pack lightly.

View more about The Informant! reviews

Extended Reading
  • Irma 2022-01-03 08:01:44

    Looking at Fei Naozi, I went to watch a horror movie.

  • Vince 2022-03-26 09:01:08

    So good-looking, Soderbergh's aesthetic choices are unexpected but all oddly coordinated. Especially praiseworthy is the script, which has been extracted from 600 pages of non-fiction literature, and the voiceover setting is even more amazing. Music and performances are also good. The first half of the film is humorous, and the second half begins to be serious, but heavy makeup and light makeup are always appropriate. NYT's film review said it well, the film is really good, but I don't know how it got such a low score.

The Informant! quotes

  • Mark Whitacre: There should be a tv show about a guy who calls home one day and he's there, he answers, he's talking to himself, only he's someone else. He's somehow divided into two, and the second one of him drives away and the rest of the show is about him trying to find the guy.

  • Mark Whitacre: [on the phone] Well, they kept coming to the house and they only had ADM's side of the story.

    Brian Shepard: You talked to the Wall Street Journal, Mark? What did you say? It's real important that you not talk to the press.

    Mark Whitacre: Me? I told them I had no comment, but didn't matter, they already had the story, anyway. They already had it. Did you see my stipple portrait? It's pretty good.