After watching the movie, I couldn't help but think of "The Mummy", which is also an exotic action movie with ghosts. "The Mummy 1" was released in 1999, when it brought many people a refreshing storyline and shocking visual impact. Comparing Persia and Egypt, Persia is regrettably different from Egypt. Personally, I feel that there are three differences:
1. As a film with an exotic legend as the background, it is the responsibility to bring the audience an atmosphere full of Persian style. What is the style of Persia, I don't understand very well, is it with amazing architecture? Or a belly dancer with deep eye sockets and black eyeliner and ringed bells? From the movie, I didn't feel the Persian amorous feelings blowing from my face. I could define this story as a prince of Egypt or a prince of Sparta. Thinking of "The Mummy", I will think of the coquettish and punctual Egyptian queen, and the bald and sexy high priest. In Persia, the heroine who is responsible for exuding Persian style is unfortunately a tough and modern American beauty. I can only have unlimited YY, if there is a veiled, eye-rolling beauty with a soft snake waist to match our hero prince, what a wonderful scene!
2. The ending of Persia is a bit unsatisfactory, and it seems a bit anticlimactic. When the prince rescued the Blade of Time from the bad uncle, he immediately exposed the bad uncle's tricks in a righteous and stern manner. The audience certainly knows what's going on, but from the point of view of everyone else in the story, they should have no idea what's going on. The uncle, who was revered and revived a minute ago, was suddenly accused of being an extremely sinister villain who tried to usurp the throne. With just two short sentences from the male protagonist, everyone could see the clue behind it? Secondly, the bad uncle has endured so many years of resentment, and he has always pretended to be very loyal on the surface. fits his character. The most fake thing is that the final love between the princess and the prince is really hasty, and it can only be interpreted as the king looking at mung beans. I don't know if the director finally has no emotion and time to interpret the ending, and just enjoy the family. Hello, I'm good, everyone.
"The Mummy" 3.11 years ago left us with many classic images: roaring faces in sandstorms, dense black bugs, and the perfect combination of special effects and plots interprets ghosts and ghosts as a climax. The Persian scene after 11 years is big and the special effects are perfect, but how far can the special effects improve in 11 years? It's embarrassing to maintain a uniform level with the old-timers. Perhaps what the production team lacks is not innovative special effects, but perhaps more imaginative and bold imaginations?
Finally, I still recommend everyone to see the Prince of Persia. He is quite handsome, the storyline is very compact, and the scenes are also good-looking. It's just the prince in my memory, maybe this is just the story of another prince with the same name as you.
View more about Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time reviews
