Emotions and tempers do not need to be divided between positive and negative. I doubt how effective the guidance of psychological construction is, because all the processes need to be experienced by the parties themselves. For example, Max, mania makes all education invalid. Only a trip to the home of the beast can make him immune to negative emotions. He is a child; normal children should be depressed, lonely and angry; children who have seen ferocious beasts naturally know how to control and choose their emotions.
The same is true for adults. We are all regulars of Beast Island. We went to the island to learn about our destructive power, domineering, jealous, cowardly, and hypocritical, and then chose to leave to show our faces.
Growth, like production and other accompanying processes, is natural and cruel. Or cruelty can't be talked about, these things are there. It is contrived and redundant to be pitiful or cruel.
So, in the final analysis, I doubt the necessity of psychological counseling.
The logic is like this. We usually resort to education. Is education really effective? Where do the qualifications of educators come from? Just as science cannot answer all our questions, because science itself is created by us. Is it okay to ask and answer by yourself? There is no need to ask questions at all.
In this way, Ai VV can justify the explanation by saying that he has no education.
Movie rating PG, it can be seen that they praised the original work but did not really figure out the situation. Obviously it should be G-class, loosen the reins and protection of the children and let them jump in. Isn't the home of the beast in every kid's head?
ps James Gandolfini (Tony'Soprano') has high voice recognition.
pps It is said that the person who made an emergency landing on the Hudson River half a year later still had psychological shadows and was unable to bathe and swim normally. It is recommended that they go to the Beast Homeland for a walk.
View more about Where the Wild Things Are reviews
