Some people say that it is the protagonist himself who provides the information anonymously, which is obviously wrong. The beauty assistant said that a friend of hers provided this information, and the final effect of this information was to find the base of the protagonist. If it was him, wouldn't this be a game of right and left?
Let me talk about the impression this movie gave me. First of all, in terms of rhythm, until the dialogue between the protagonist and the lawyer in a single cell, the climax continued, constantly refreshing the protagonist's IQ and strategy, but when it comes to the dialogue in the cell, it becomes Cumbersome procrastination and letting bombs go off doesn’t seem like a choice law enforcement makes. Looking back and thinking about that bomb was so easy to carry back to the prison, I'm really sorry for the ten-year plan. It took so much effort to put the bomb in, but only a mobile phone was left as a detonator?
Secondly, looking back and reconsidering the protagonist's choice, he lost the support of "justice" when he killed the inmate in the same cell, so why did he let the lawyer go again and again? After all, if the bombing of the mayor succeeds, it would be impossible to retaliate against the lawyer.
Finally, when I saw the ending, I felt that the screenwriter suddenly changed? The protagonist's IQ was raised so high in the front, and suddenly he was completely unable to deal with the lawyer's "counter-attack"? This ending is really confusing. I guess that in order to make "justice defeat evil", or to give lawyers more drama, the protagonist's appearance is forcibly reduced, or if the explosion of the city hall is successful, it will be more difficult to end, so it can only be ended in haste. It's a pity that the previous God unfolded, maybe it's easier to show this escalating violent confrontation in a TV series.
View more about Law Abiding Citizen reviews
