end, he died of this public image of being " conspired " by the media and the public. Of course, he is not a complete victim. He has also deliberately shaped himself in this way by using the current social psychology.
When the criticized artist Gillian in Yanzhaomen tried to explain to the public that he was "not the kind of person everyone imagined," so everyone was immersed in "pretending to be innocent is a private matter, but you can't sell it." In my anger, in fact, no one has lied to anyone in this. I will give whatever you want, and I have to eat at the same time. This is the win-win benefit in the commodity economy. If you say you are cheating, everyone can only cheat. Everyone.
This is the birth of conspiracy theory, and also the birth of misunderstanding, because once you get serious, you will find that there is a general internal connection between the factors behind a certain event. Together, we have caused it to happen, and even get into it. No one can get rid of the relationship, but often we only attribute the crux of the problem to a direct cause that caused it, that is, a scapegoat, so that other actors in this tragedy can retreat comfortably.
We seem to be rebelling against authority, but in fact we are seeking our own death. This is the characteristic of scapegoats. The "justice" they want will never come, because they went the wrong way at the beginning. Responsibility after the event bears the risk.
Poor people must be hateful. This is the basis for the operation of the system, because when a poor person becomes rich, he will find that he has lost even the right to resent.
This film also reminds me of Salinger no longer publishing novels after "The Catcher in the Rye". In addition to questioning the publisher and even readers’ sincerity in reading his works, he also wants to protect himself from outside influences. Under the prestigious reputation, it is no longer customary to publish a book of things that everyone loves to see.
View more about Do the Right Thing reviews
