This film pieced together elements and parodied the first one, but the plot was full of loopholes: why did Harry just recover his inflexibility, and the cowboy can suddenly recover? The first is that celebrities and dignitaries support the villains, and the common people are kept in the dark, so the protagonist needs to sneak into the enemy camp secretly, and finally destroy it in one fell swoop. In the second part, the villain directly challenged the government and the people. Why didn't they fight back? Could it be that they would only be captured and finally had to rely on the protagonist and Harry to go deep into the tiger's den alone? The first bar fight scene was accompanied by the continuous display of Harry's various novel equipment; in the second bar fight, the cowboy's noose was an electric cutting rope. Is the Texas secret service organization so shabby? (Can the screenwriter be more lazy?) In the first part, the ultimate intention of the villain was hidden for a long time. He carried out population extermination in the name of preventing global warming and saving the world, and finally revealed the villain with the massacre scene in the church The intentions and methods are astounding. In the second part, the villain wants to legalize drug trafficking, and the realm is much smaller. In the end, the villain uses a TV monologue to directly express his intentions. . . The first part has class confrontation - the powerful want to eliminate the commoners, but they are killed in the end; there is also the personal growth of the protagonist - from a street gangster to a hero who saves the world. In the second part, I desperately tried to revert to the formula of the previous work (to bring Harry back to life), but except for the scene design and construction, I couldn't see any ideas and creativity.
View more about Kingsman: The Golden Circle reviews
