But to be honest, the movie is not good, especially when compared with the first three movies.
At least half an hour in the first part of the film, I didn't know what to say, I said too many meaningless things, I started without a second, and the footage was edited in a mess. The two plans go hand in hand, why do you have to be related to Spy 3? Damn, since this story is completely different from that one, why don't you just start another story, don't you have to die if you don't pull the stumbling block? A pretending to be a mystery, making people more and more incomprehensible.
In fact, this film basically finally realized that it had told such a simple and nonsensical story. After reviewing it, it was nothing more than to terminate the harvesting plan that was carried out at the same time for fear of the stumbling block plan being exposed. All the agents or medics involved in the plan had to die, thus leading to JR's life on the run.
If it's such a simple story, why do you spend more than half of the time talking about stuff that doesn't make sense? Someone knows what JR just started to salvage in the cold and snowy water, and what the mission is. Does it mean that one plan contains another plan to foreshadow the next episode, or is it just to echo the scene where Matt swam away like a tadpole in the water at the end of The Escape 3? This shows that this one is a continuation of that one in the same vein. For this, I have drawn a lot of space to talk about Spy Shadow 3. Anyway, the main line of this one is weak.
And the man in the wooden house said that the people in the same project were later killed by the bomb, and it took almost half an hour to talk about the little things. The specific tasks of the harvest plan and what it is for are basically vague. It's a pity that the long-awaited Edward Norton doesn't have much room to play. There is no psychological warfare element. It's a waste of talent. Besides, Edward is so old. He found that he couldn't watch foreign actors in theaters. Countless wrinkles and pores were enlarged. , No amount of powder can't hold it down, and a little bit is too old to die. Poor Edward's eye bags, the wrinkles on his forehead, OMG, the moon doesn't go around people, only the fluffy brown eyelashes look cute.
Those recurring pills are useless when it comes to the end, but I don't know why I have to go to Manila to find the source of the disease to re-infect them again. Have you ever heard that weaning off dependence on a certain drug is achieved by re-infection? It really sounds incredible. Ah, the trouble is, the screenwriter is a little brainy. . . .
In Spy Shots 3, Sean played a lot of people from the CIA, and let them run around all over the world for him alone, and they were overwhelmed. In 4, I saw JR hide in pitifully everywhere, basically all the shots of being chased and killed, and Sean's genius lies in daring to go deep into the enemy's base and attack Huanglong. If you can only dodge and can't fight back, what's so good about it, a comparison of 4 is no doubt vulgar.
In 3, both Randy and Sean are very good. They play psychological warfare. In 4, this is basically invisible. The CIA has no brains. If Edward is in command, the old men should be useless. Retire. Besides, Spy 3 is all about playing with the mind. Sean's tricks are amazing, and JR in 4 is not unintelligent, but in comparison, it's really flat. It's not that Matt is handsome and acting, at least the script is really good, hundreds of times stronger than these 4.
Therefore, the success of the first three films is the main factor that Matter added to the book. Without these two important components, the level of this 4 is really low. I don't know how many series.
Of course, JR is also very hardworking, and the performance of the play is not lost. So the difference is not his fault, but a hardware problem, which is doomed to the level of this film.
If you want to say that there are two less objective factors of success, but there is one that can be set artificially, it is the shooting technique. The shooting method in 4 is still based on the close-range real shooting method of the first three films, so it is still quite brilliant in the car chase. Just like the nirvana of the spy series, it is cool enough to play car chase in a place with many people and narrow roads.
This 4 is also a continuation of the essence of the first three, and it can be said to be out of blue. So the only thing in this film, I emphasize that the only thing worth watching is the last half hour of the killer car chase. If it wasn't for this, it'd be worth less than five points.
The shooting techniques and editing are very exciting. The biggest improvement is that JR has a beautiful woman behind her back. Unlike other films, the beautiful women are all vases. The beautiful women in this film played a crucial role at a critical time. First, I smack it with my hand helmet, and then I use my feet to push the killer without slapping it off. Nima, the car is speeding up to hundreds of hours, and you dare to take your life like this. I can’t wait for the younger generation to compare, and finally the killer was pushed straight into the pillar. Die tragically. After the crisis of chasing and killing was resolved, she was faced with the crisis of hitting the wall. It was the beauty who took the time to pull JR and jumped out of the car in time to avoid the accident of everyone being hit and killed. In the end, she also used two tears to influence the uncle of the fishing boat. Of course, the role of the gold watch cannot be ignore. In general, saving lives can be regarded as courageous and resourceful. She is much calmer and more capable than the heroine in The Spy Shots 1.
This film is ok with JR and the heroine. As for Edward, I feel that it is really a talent that I use less. People who are poached purely for the sake of increasing the box office. Basically, they can play as well as other people, so it is really not worth it for us Edward. Don't play the next time you don't have a role, so as not to lower your average level.
View more about The Bourne Legacy reviews