Reminder from the front row: Personal thoughts are a bit extreme, please don't read if you mind, so as not to disturb your mood.
I'm a very hostile person. Maybe I've read too many extreme novels like "The Destruction of the Pole", which were written many years ago, but I think what's written in it is quite reasonable. Ability to be a good person?
First of all, let's talk about the shortcomings of this movie:
1. The male protagonist has been in a hurry
to learn to use superpowers for 8 years, and the white-haired old man also said that someone is helping him.
Although everything is going well for the male protagonist, I don't know how to use reconnaissance and anti-reconnaissance abilities. IQ +1
has been discovered anyway. Why don't you tell Milly, so that she becomes one cause after another Origin (needed for the plot) +2
At the beginning of the chapter, I was bullied by that strong guy. I didn't learn some PK skills, but I was already enough. When I was strong, I took it to the police station. If he was thrown into a place where no one was there, it would be fine if he was thrown into the sea! +3
In the end, I went back to Millie, damn, just bring a tiger finger, I don't have any PK skills, you should learn from your friends and bring a musket! +4
(if there is no protagonist's halo, it is estimated that N times have died)
Advantages:
First of all, let me introduce the source of this jumping superpower, +1
and satisfy the evil thoughts of us "primary monks", go to robbery, +2
on the screen , I think the way of jumping (picture) is good, the structure system of jumping (will be tracked) is a bit interesting that it is different from usual (usually jumping directly without leaving traces, forgetting which one is also about Space jumps, but this type of web article has been written badly), +3
Personalization, don't tell me about good people and bad people. When I was a teenager, I had already set my character direction, and there was no one to guide me. It's normal to be an extreme type. There is no need to be a good person to save people or something. Anyway, you destroy it. If you follow the rules of time and space, if you are caught, you will be fucked to death, so they won't care if you are a good person or not. +4
I think every rebellious person will have such a fantasy, if you are a "good person" I have nothing to say.
I quite like novels and movies with superpowers, such as "Super Gamer" and "Super Power Out of Control",
but I find the kind-hearted protagonist very annoying, maybe I like a more chaotic world, (primary monks are too weak Now , I hope the world will be reshuffled),
why do you have to be a good person (question raised on the premise of having superpowers, ahem, we ordinary people avoid being bad people, and good people have to choose to do it, don’t give yourself to "harmed".)? I don’t think the current world is so good. Anyway, those who have money have money, and those who have no money are no accident, but they still have no money. Those who should eat delicacies of mountains and seas should eat delicacies of mountains and seas, and those who should drink white porridge should still drink white porridge. In the end, life is not mediocre. the past.
After reading several film reviews, they are basically "good reviews". In fact, I think this kind of anti-human psychology is very normal. Insects eat leaves, birds eat insects, and birds are eaten by people (cough cough, evil intentions), and finally Man eats all things, so why can't man eat man? Isn't the current world just cannibalism (exaggerated?)? Why should people with super powers serve GOVERMENT? Does disobedience mean obliteration?
Hehe, after all, human is still divided into levels, what is the difference, top-level people want to kill a person, there are many ways to kill a person, and small people want to turn over and have a lot of hard work. If you become a top predator, do you still need to care about the feeling of "food"? It's just for the sake of "world peace". They don't allow others to escape their control. Isn't it just a few people who make the final decision?
I give this movie a good review, mainly because the graphics and special effects are slightly powerful (in 2017, domestic movies and TV dramas are still so soy sauce), and secondly, in terms of thinking, I think this kind of thinking is not suitable for the current environment, but I like this kind of rebellion very much. Yes, arrogant, cough, pretending to be a breath, after all, this is my dream, and it has not disappeared now.
Natural selection, survival of the fittest. When it is flooded, the world will be chaotic, and when it is chaotic, the world will not be owned by so few people.
View more about Jumper reviews
