On the way to watch the movie, I didn't know what the movie was about, so I happened to chat with a friend about this topic, how to define "I".
Friends say that coherent or complete "memory" defines "me", but memory will be tampered with, damaged or even lost. Is the "me" with the tampered or damaged memory still the complete "me"? If memory is stored, the medium itself must not be defined as "me".
"I" is a rather ambiguous and complex composition.
If I had to find a reference to "I", it would be "consciousness". Even, I think, the world around me is created by my consciousness. That is to say, the world in which we each exist is "I", and the "body" is only created because consciousness needs to rely on a subject from a first-person perspective.
"I" is made up of multiple "consciousness", sight, smell, hearing, touch and thought. In our "world", "I" can be said to be infinite, and any other existence is created by consciousness, and we know very little about it (the images we see and the assumptions we get from feedback). Perhaps it is because of this that I have this feeling that the "world" is just a "me".
As for Kane and Lena at the end, or whether it was the original Kane and Lena, it's hard to tell. If "consciousness" defines me, then I think Lena is still Lena, but she has evolved (mutated) and evolved on the basis of primitive consciousness. The cloned (surviving) Kane, I think it is no longer that Kane. To a certain extent, their consciousness is biased. When Kane committed suicide, another Kane was in charge of the video. They have different perspectives and different memories. , the world of consciousness is not at one point (forked).
In general, the brain hole of the movie is very interesting, and the production is a bit rough, but I never care about the production when I watch the film, I like the story.
View more about Annihilation reviews
