The ending of revenge in the rivers and lakes often indicates a nihilistic worldview. There is no reason, no value, no morality, only emotional catharsis, only revenge, and no reason at all. This is how similar it is now.
No matter whether you support it or not, no matter how much reasoning you say or how many chestnuts you cite, people will not give up revenge, killing, guns in their hands and resentment in their hearts. The mutual annihilation of the one you love and the one he loves, and reason ceases to exist, only the howl of revenge remains, and that is what it is now.
When explaining phenomena from a mechanical point of view, it is a deconstruction of the sacred (it can be happiness, hope, in short, it is difficult to say what), which is unbearable for most people, especially in poets, such as economics. Ci was determined to oppose this interpretation. Of course, if you don't think about it, life is like this. But now that I know, I think most people will think about it.
This is a kind of modern life, a shackle that cannot be lifted in the contemporary West. However, this kind of thing has spread all over the world. We know that everything is a "machine" governed by the laws of physics. Yet we can still be angry, happy, sad, and yes, these emotions are governed by the laws of physics, but what does it matter? Even if there is no "ultimate meaning", we can still set a "meaning" and derive value from it. Itdosen't matter at all.
The reason why people are so afraid, angry, and react so strongly to the heterogeneous space created by the film can only explain one problem. The threat brought by this work is too similar to the anxiety of the sick real society. People will not be afraid to leave themselves. very distant thing. The idea of invoking creative freedom or a niche point of view to justify a work has come under heavy attack. And this also foreshadows the end of the creation. But there are countless other creations related to it. As a social problem, before the fundamental problem is solved, it may only exacerbate the hidden desires of some people.
When you explain things mechanically, the results are not your own. Because the mechanical point of view does not contain subjective explanations, the explanations he brings are objective. For example, when you say that "the pleasure of eating beef is the function of molecules", this explanation is universal and applies to everyone. But behind this is why you eat beef, and what is your purpose for eating beef? You can still explain this mechanistically, because "your body lacks less calories than the average", why is the average missing? You can still continue to explain from a mechanical point of view, but have you found that no matter how you explain it, you can’t explain it to the purpose (because it is an objective explanation), and people’s decisions on events are Subjectively, you can't say that you are hungry, in fact, it is because of &*%...%...&*% that you stop eating, it is precisely because you are hungry that you go to eat out of a subjective decision. Mechanical materialism just lacks such an explanation of resolution (or purpose), and the same principle applies to you who think "I don't want the romance of those who are ignorant", this explanation is a subjective He does not contain the objectivity of mechanistic, and this passage is not a mechanistic explanation. Of course, I also stated that I "do not understand those who adhere to thorough mechanical materialism." If all explanations are objectified, then where does this non-objective subjective decision come from? Of course, you can also interpret subjective decisions as "products of perceptual excitement". Humans themselves have no special meaning and are all "products of perceptual excitement", so I think human beings may be stagnant.
Even knowing that people feel happy when they eat beef is a function of molecules, they still feel happy. Even knowing that the sense of meaning is a special connection between neurons, it is still looking for ways to make this connection more. That's what drives life as a mechanical materialist.
Mechanical materialism itself contains an ultimate pursuit of "explaining everything". I don’t want a sense of sanctity imagined out of ignorance, and I don’t want any hazy beauty. What I want is that what was originally a black box in the eyes of human beings has been revealed one by one, and it has become an orderly combination of laws. The wonderful complexity of these laws exceeds Without any myths and legends, this is the romance that belongs to the materialists.
This is the best attitude at the moment. The concepts of progress and decadence are so closely related to each other that if one tries to generalize, one arrives at a paradoxical conclusion: progress is decadence, and vice versa, decadence is progress. This is unavoidable, it is a kind of existence, and it is a living situation that the individual cannot imagine and can only accept.
Just let me be a silent witness of an era, anyway, I don't. . . , Not Buddhist, what do you want to do?
View more about Taken 2 reviews
