I'm not a law student, and I've never studied any of these. Here's just a superficial view of an engineering student:
Rudolf Abel has held the last conviction for his country and for his work throughout his life, although in the United States In his eyes, he is a public enemy. However, if we think about it from the perspective of Chinese people, and look at this character objectively from the perspective of a third country, he is undoubtedly noble and dedicated to the country. His sentence is not so appropriate. I think that's what the movie wants to express.
We all like to speak of universal values, so is there also a universal law, at least a universal morality, to adjudicate disputes between nations? We all talk about international integration. What is the role of the United Nations and the International Court of Justice? We can often see criminals in a certain country seeking political asylum in other countries. This kind of asylum is a right of the country applying for asylum to exercise its national sovereignty. Why should this kind of behavior be allowed?
We are usually represented, and in our own country, are we seen by others as from which city? Which country will be represented abroad? It usually depends on where we are and our sphere of influence. However, it should be said that we are hardly represented as Earthlings, after all we have not encountered aliens. Therefore, it can be said that the country, at least at present, is the largest and the most represented. So, is it only from the national level to comment on a person?
There are many heroes in history who fought for the country in the north and south, invincible and expanded the territory. It is clear that they have done immeasurable harm to other nations and have brought material and spiritual deprivation to their people. However, we still call them heroes. This can't help but remind me of Zhu Qizhen, Emperor Yingzong of the Ming Dynasty. Not to mention his political achievements, just looking at his attitude in the enemy camp is admirable.
Yes, then, shall we kill the enemy who comes against us? In this way, there is an ambassador for everything that everyone does. So, is everything we do honorable? Not all of them can meet their James Donovan lawyer, I think, and not all of the captives can wait until someone can be exchanged.
As a social person, all we can do is to do our job well and do what we should do to the best of our ability. Rudolf Abel completed the mission given to him by the state, the US justices also made their own judgments, and James Donovan also did his best to complete his litigation entrustment and prisoner exchange. Although there are many characters in East Germany , but each of them is doing their own duties, no one should be responsible, everyone should be respected, of course, except for the pilot.
View more about Bridge of Spies reviews
