Question about the last arrow

Enos 2022-04-23 07:01:24

Not to mention I haven't read the original. From the movie alone I think the last arrow represents the perfect ending. The relevant persons are analyzed in turn.

The biggest beneficiary after the last arrow is definitely the black female commander, but there are very few scenes of the black female commander in the film, and it can be roughly seen that she is a good person. There may be a description of the dark side of the black female commander in the original book, but that is not something that a film party like me can discuss. My attitude is that even if the black female commander is the most profitable party in the end, it cannot be inferred from the movie that the black female commander is the one who is blackened.

Is President Snow a winner? I don’t think so. Snow should only care about the outcome between him and the heroine, and has very little interaction with the rebel leaders (most of the rebel leaders took the initiative to interact with him, but Snow did not. take care). I don't think Snow's idea of ​​a one-for-one with the rebel leader was as strong. As for seducing the heroine to shoot the leader of the rebel army and then use the hands of the new leader to get rid of the heroine, I can only say that I may have thought too much. The political wisdom embodied in the entire Hunger Games is far higher than this. Even if someone uses the trick of borrowing a knife to kill, it can only be that the leader of the rebel army wants to use Snow's hand to get rid of the heroine. Snow is far higher than this level. Of course, that Snow was premeditated can also be explained by Snow's laughter before his death. According to the realm of the movie or the original book, I am more willing to explain that Snow called the heroine and did the right thing. Simply put, it was not because the heroine was manipulated to laugh, but because the heroine was no longer manipulated by the rebel leaders. And laugh.

Also think that the heroine did the right thing and the game designer in the second movie of the series. This character is more sinister and often likes evil smiles, but he should be the righteous side (as for why he looks sinister and likes evil smiles, we have to start from the second part of the series, I can only say that the plot needs it), after the last arrow, he was temporarily suspended The letter from the detained hostess was written by him, and the feelings expressed in the letter did not seem to be forged. To put it simply, I think this designer is a bystander in the matter of the last arrow. He said that the last arrow is acceptable, and I also feel that it is acceptable. The same goes for Black Smith (the female lead's coach), the female lead's styling manager. Almost no one has particularly negative emotions about the last arrow. It can't be said that everyone was involved in the plot to murder the rebel leader. The designer's evil smile at the end is so meaningful, maybe the original party can provide some clues. I think it was he who persuaded the leader of the rebel army but didn't persuade him. There was a bit of a sense that the leader of the rebel army was to blame in his laughter.

The biggest loser, of course, is the arrow. It can be seen from the film that the rebel leader is basically blackened at the end. He skipped the democratic election and directly became the interim president and did not stipulate the time for the actual democratic election. This is the enemy of the people. This is the biggest black point. The little black dot also has the secret words of Commander 451 before her death, and the scene where the heroine is announced as soon as she disappears, including the redesign of the Little Hunger Games, not much to say.

The only thing about Rashomon is who ordered the bomb that the heroine saw at the gate of the Presidential Palace. I still think Snow's words are more believable. The first one, the female protagonist is close to the second half of the presidential palace, in fact, the rebels have already come to the door. I am skeptical that the government army can still have usable planes in this situation. I remember that when the second district finally attacked the fort, the first step was to cut off the airfield to prevent escape. This plane seems to me to be more credible by the rebels. The second Snow's words are more self-evident than the rebels. After all, after the plane dropped the bomb, Snow's own troops mutinied first. I believe that Eston's IQ even if he had a plane in his hand at that time, he should not It's like playing with a plane. Although no one from the rebel army came forward to talk about the plane, the heroine's childhood sweetheart said "I don't know" after the drama, which felt more suspicious.

How should I put it, if there is a conspiracy, I can only say that there are too many people involved in the conspiracy, and there are too few foreshadowings in the movie. Maybe there are vague descriptions in the original book, but I think the film is still very clear. The villain who is blinded by the rebel leaders at the end also wears a very undemocratic clothes (clothes similar to capes are basically dictators. The standard setting, for example, in the Armageddon series is usually a cloak), she was shot to death by the last arrow, and I really didn't feel any fluctuations in my heart. . .

View more about The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 2 reviews

Extended Reading

The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 2 quotes

  • Peeta Mellark: You love me. Real or not real?

    Katniss Everdeen: Real.

  • Katniss Everdeen: Prim! PRIMROSE!