evaluate:
Good movie, there is no so-called "parallel universe" and "parallel space-time" in the comments, there is only one space-time, with the deduction of the plot, the clues are in "the fatalism that the past/history cannot be changed" and "the past/history can be changed" The ambiguity makes the audience, like the protagonist, unable to guess the ending and hangs in their hearts.
Deduction:
The first time a note was sent to interfere with the past/history, the protagonist's partner Lawrence Minuti died by the dock trestle at the lakeside of the suspect's house.
Looking back at the clues of the original timeline: the car of the protagonist partner was taken to the case handling center as the car of the dead at the dock at the scene of the big explosion. At that time, it was speculated that the protagonist partner was on vacation on the boat and then blew up to death, but the body was not found for the time being.
Can the past/history be changed? It seems that, after all, it was presumed that he died in a big explosion, but now it is confirmed that he died by the lake of the suspect's house.
Unchangeable fate? It seems to be the same. After the protagonist's note intervened, the partner was shot and taken away after going to the pier, but the car was left at the pier. It may have been taken as the car of the victim of the big explosion and was pulled to the case handling center. After the protagonist intervened, it happened. may be part of the original timeline (the partner may have died like this in the first place).
Fate or not, the protagonist does not know, and neither does the audience.
The second time to teleport himself to intervene in the past/history, 1. Drive an ambulance into the suspect's house, rescue Claire Kuchever by the lake, and then go to Claire's house to rectify before setting off.
Clues from the original timeline: When tracking the suspect 4 days ago, I followed the lakeside house with an ambulance and an explosion scene.
Can the past/history be changed? It seemed, after all, Claire had already been rescued.
Unchangeable fate? It seems that the ambulance and the explosion, the fingerprints and blood on Claire's house, etc. have all become part of the original timeline content due to the intervention of the protagonist.
2. Claire jumps on the ferry again, wearing the clothes of the original timeline when she was killed.
Combined with clues from the original timeline: what the suspect mentioned during the interrogation process with the protagonist after being caught: Fate, you don’t understand, he (the suspect) won
At this time, people can't bear to guess the worst ending: this is an unchangeable fate, Claire died on the cruise ship, the protagonist who crossed was unable to save the success, the cruise ship finally exploded, the suspect won, and everything was the content of the original timeline part. The suspect may have fought the protagonist who passed through and won (the cruise ship eventually exploded, so he won), but now you (the protagonist) don't know it yet.
ending:
The dust settles and the past/history can be changed. But the mainstream no longer exists and is replaced by a tributary.
That is to say, the protagonist of the mainstream after crossing, after the past/history has been changed, will not exist (whether or not he was killed), but will be replaced by the protagonist of the tributary.
Interlude: Combined with the protagonist's confident appearance, I once thought that the bomb would not explode when it came into contact with water.
There are indeed some small flaws, such as: Claire's house has not been called to the police for a long time, so it can be changed to, "When she guessed that the protagonist was the perpetrator, the protagonist walked into her and caused psychological pressure to her. She didn't have time to pick up the phone to call the police and hurriedly hurried. Pick up the pistol and face off"
The reason why the protagonist asks Claire to follow him can be changed to, "The protagonist knows that the murderer knows that her address may be coming before letting her follow him. The call from Claire's friend Beth Beth may also be the murderer's call to guess if she is at home and not let her pick it up."
The flaws do not hide the beauty, it is worth watching, I give it 8.5-9 points.
View more about Deja Vu reviews
