Prejudice and Justice, Jurisprudence and Reason

Mireya 2021-10-20 19:02:18

C / I don't quite understand why this memoir narrative, which exists only as a cumbersome text, has caused a lot of misleading to the audience. The most direct drawback is to cover up the existing dual perspectives of children/adults. Fortunately, this kind of perspective tension is still drawn through the control of the narrative rhythm. The stray and bizarre experience of childhood summer and the court drama of the adult world with strict distribution of space form a completely different time quality. But the flaw is still there. The part of the adult world is described as being too regular to be able to separate the two worlds enough before they collide. The ending is indeed a clever pen to disturb the tone: the disoriented child emerges from the thick cocoon and encounters another parasitic, summoned "ghost" over time.

Christiana 2021-10-20 19:02:19

The language of the shot can be called a model, and the conversion of the shot repeatedly uses superimposed effects; the children’s part of the story is full of tension and suspense, which spurs the audience’s appetite; the court trial, like other court trials, is inevitable preaching and sensational. Fortunately, time not long.