camera starts with a killer killing five passers-by at random, which seems very random To kill, just look for it, aim and shoot. Apparently he might be hiding something. Let the audience sigh, in the end is what? After thinking about it, there must be a causal relationship to form such a topic and suspense, but the movie focuses too much on how to compete with the real murderer, and ignores the focus of interests in the logical relationship. In fact, Brother Tom found the answer long ago, but there were too many obstacles in the process, and there was no way to explain it at once.
Every day there is a disaster somewhere, every day someone breaks up, every day someone succeeds at something, every day someone is unhappy, every day someone opportunistic, every day something hangs in the balance.
I think as a lawyer, I can just defend my client. As for the truth, too much investigation is meaningless to me and the case itself, not to mention that the police have appeared as internal ghosts in common sense, so what else is there to investigate. In fact, what the "inner ghost" said is right, does he have a choice? He didn't.
In fact, I admire that old man named JACK. He had to lose his finger in order to make a living in a Siberian prison. He reasonably explained the price he had to pay in order to survive. He justified that he only took the part that should be taken, so if not With the appearance of Brother Tom, they continued to "work" with money!
For example, the butterfly effect may push this relationship to an unpredictable train due to the occurrence of one event, but human beings are so brave, trying and accepting all of this regardless of their own lives, all choices are not right or wrong, and in the long run From the point of view, only who is more frustrated!
There are winners and losers, and the final outcome is not difficult to guess. The "killer party" died, and Tom continued to wander in the city as a retired "soldier". It is said that there was a foreign teacher in our school who said that he used to serve in Iraq, and another friend also served there. As a result, during the conversation, the Chinese foreign teacher was full of loopholes. The result of the "inspection" was that he lied, and then the Chinese foreign teacher would no longer know Colombia. University study, we suspect that it is only as an auditor or may not be able to find the record of his reading. Sure enough, Chinese foreign teachers are now teaching children in Hefei for small classes, and he continues to stay there as a bridge between Columbia University and Chinese students. Saying this is to say that in the United States, perhaps more young people are honored by serving or that the Chinese feel that they can integrate into them. There are scenes of war in the movie, and it is emphasized that no one was shot and killed at the time of serving for three years, which is a big lie. So are people starving to death in this war?
There is only one kind of heroism in the world, that is to see everything in the world and still love it. After all, Romain Rolland
is still in the minority. The plot of the film and novel is very serious and there are few adaptations, so I decided to read the original book. "One Shot" is said to be written by Richard Richard, the "king of British thrillers".
PS. The only good-looking Burberry black trench coat for the heroine in the play is not bad. There are also three characteristics of the police analyzed by Tom. It seems that he can't drive a private car to do errands, he doesn't drive a Cadillac, he can't... I don't remember clearly, but the two police elder sisters next to me laughed, and they were the only ones who laughed.
This film is 130 minutes long, and I have WC3 times. The pace is slow and I wonder if the director is afraid to revise the script, or the screenwriter can stretch it for a long time.
View more about Jack Reacher reviews
