There are too many failures, so I picked the three most impressive ones and wrote them down.
1 The
setting of roles and scenes
can only be summed up by one point. Tom has too many scenes. The whole play has only one protagonist and a number of supporting roles. Speaking of which, haha, it's so humorous, and even the character of Jack, who has almost no editing, is completely incomplete. At the end, there is no clear and clear explanation for why he must come to participate in this case. The desire to curry favor with the boss has given too many handsome scenes. He's so handsome and shy, it seems that this person has no human characteristics at all. Saving Helen is the bridge that best reflects your human characteristics as an ordinary person, but God, why did I suddenly have the kind of you to save at the end Is she purely for reasons of justice? If it's because you love her, can you give a hint when you fell in love with her?
Helen can definitely be regarded as a heroine, but her most important role-when she doubts her father, her inner anxiety, pain, all are gone, because at the same time Jack is working hard to investigate, your role can't be Grab, so must chop! So when I look back, I really feel that the existence of the heroine has little value at all.
There is also the boss of the shooting battalion, the key person, who was almost mentioned in one stroke, and finally played such a key role. The previous character's explanation is almost the same as the gangsters in the auto parts field... 囧
2
fighting design
When I saw Brother Ah Tang taking a bath, I couldn't hold it any longer. When did the melee fight happen? (ps: Tom Cruse's nips are really sexy), the result is good! It only appears at the end of the movie, and it appears reluctantly. The two of them were in the pouring rain, and the rain was so heavy that the sound of gunshots could hardly be heard. The two of them threw guns with no bullets at each other, and suddenly they fought. It was a tacit understanding. Considering that the personal safety of the hostages is still under threat, is this assault method really efficient? Well, even if you tacitly chose to fight meleely, just because you like it, can you tell me, in a place like a quarry where there are obstacles around, why don't you put him behind him and slap his head On a rock or a car next to it? Or are your fists harder? More serious damage with one punch and one punch? ?
3 The investment of 60 million yuan for the
set
is definitely not a lot, but it is not that small, right? The place where all the key plots take place in the end is just such a big quarry. And I don't know why, the screenwriter and director carefully set the last scene to make people think that this is Tom's single... The Quarry Office doesn't want to complain at all, it's really a trick to find such a small container. But with your tiny quarry, the office size is reasonable.
There is another place where there are many scenes: Helen's office. But, oh my God, all the shots are given to that window, what makes people feel embarrassed, even if you move the camera, even a little bit will make people think you have intentions? ? ! ! !
In the first half hour of the film, Tom was very serious about checking many things. Although in the end, the merciful and benevolent director gave us an acceptable explanation, but for me, that half hour was completely at a loss. If I put aside the paragraph he explained later, I still don't understand the way I followed him. How many spectators are so full of shooting knowledge? In short, I don't understand this paragraph at all, so I won't make more comments.
In a word, the films edited by the starring company's own company are not worth watching. Even if he is Tom.
Ruined LEE CHILD's good novel.
View more about Jack Reacher reviews
