Ironically, people, especially those who are enslaved without oppression, usually That's right, always busy fighting in the nest. It seems to be said in the Ming Dynasty that if the Chinese people do not fight in their nests, they cannot be defeated. In other words, we actually destroy ourselves. Fortunately, when the foreign oppression reaches a certain level, we will stop the civil war and unite with the foreign enemy. So China will not die. But I hope you don't always wait until the carriage comes to the edge of the cliff to know that you can't always fight for status in the car, because the car has the possibility of losing the whole.
2. You want to take all suspicions away when you shoot someone, wait till he's next to the President.
When I saw this, I was stunned by this sentence. I remembered a story in Father Brown that, in order to cover up a A group of corpses was created from a corpse. At the time, I thought the story was inexplicable, but that was the case in that book, and many truths were worth scrutinizing. It's evil enough and unexpected enough, I like it~
3. There is no head to cut off. It's a conglomerate. If one of them betrays the principles of the accrual of money and power, the others betray him. What it is human weakness. You can't kill that with a gun.
In fact, when I saw this, I felt that this movie was a bit of a big hit, and it couldn't end, but it was very practical. The high-level is always a community of interests. There is no leader and no organization. It is only based on interests and members can flow continuously. How can you defeat the interests? This is not a problem that can be solved with one person, one shot, or even ten years. The protagonist here obviously only touched the tip of the iceberg, and was exhausted by playing.
4. The last question is about the ending. The so-called community of interests, how can even the Minister of Justice be unable to handle it. Also, what is "let you go"? It's not a request at all, or a plea for mercy, it's too childish. The so-called right is to always put yourself on the side of justice, not what I am at fault, but insist on escaping from guilt , in fact it is true, the law cannot punish the colonel, so it is unexpected that Swagger can get out of the crime in the end, and at the end, he killed everyone and walked out of the fire in high spirits. Or, what can be changed by killing one or two, and he said that so many innocent bodyguards, soldiers who were ordered to act, were solved by him "handsomely". I estimate that there are more people in that village. The solution to a village is at least promoting harmony in the surrounding area. As for classmate Swagger, he has strong evidence (that is, his gun), and he has long known that publicizing the truth of Africa is just to be silenced, and tossed to death. So many people have perfectly demonstrated his handsomeness as a shooter~~
However, obviously according to this logic, it is impossible to end with a "positive" ending. It is very discordant to end up with a negative ending, obviously. So let's forgive the director, he can't do anything about it. It's like writing a story by yourself. The clues in front of you are too large and too large, and you can't control it yourself, so it's anticlimactic.
View more about Shooter reviews
