Five episodes ago, there was no problem, until the heroine got close to the hero and something started to go wrong. I think the heroine is an intelligence collector who is intuitive, clear-cut, and rigorous in her work. When monitoring means are limited, she can only take risks There is nothing wrong with his ability, but for a person who is suspected of being a terrorist who is convinced that he is a terrorist, he can still fall in love with him because he has been in bed for two days. If it is not such a promiscuous character, I will spit out such a cliché plot. The nouns blurted out can also be focused by the male protagonist with sharp ears. This man must be very fond of drinking that fruit tea. If you suspect it is a terrorist, will he tell the truth when confronted with him face to face? If you don't point a gun at you, let go of your vigilance, and tell the whole story. It really is a failed CIA. When he tells you "I love terrorists", continue to stare affectionately ~WTF, tell me how much you lack love? Knowing that I was playing the role of a junior, I couldn't control my emotions, and my life and work were messed up. My white eyes quickly turned from double eyelid to single eyelid.
Do you think the male protagonist who suddenly defected in the middle of the road can be convinced by the reason of "seeking justice for the terrorists' children, so I will abandon my children and my family to bomb government officials"? If you don't betray the country and don't give in, how can you beat your friends to death for yourself, how can you treat your enemies as friends with some sweetness, so I really don't know if the male protagonist has the backbone, I only know that the male protagonist only eats soft ones. If you have the willpower not to succumb to terrorism, but you can use the soft-hearted policy to win over you, or you can brainwash with your own children's cruelty. I want to say that you really know how to play a screenwriter. Without the sudden missile raid, I really wonder if the male protagonist would have been left there as a tutor? It took eight years of hard and soft tactics to win over an American soldier. This terrorist is really patient. At the beginning, he would feel worthless for him, and wasting eight years for an enemy who did not disclose information is simply inefficient. If one American soldier can't solve the problem, then two; if there are two things that can't be solved, then there is no need to brainwash your TMD in the first place! It is said that a long line is used to catch a big fish, but the line is too long to be retracted. In fact, I doubt whether the fish caught the bait at the beginning, but it did not. This is not the failure of the terrorists, but the failure of the screenwriter. Let the tiger return to the mountain without any insurance measures, do you think you are Professor X?
View more about Homeland reviews
