When ALICE said that sentence was just the beginning of the episode, I seemed a little surprised by the transformation of this woman. She was originally gentle and considerate, humorous and understanding. A woman who has no burden but is eager to get together, makes JASON almost abandon what he believed in, and wants to start a new life, a woman who returns to reality in an instant, remembers the night they chatted on the boat, ALICE said , "I just do this outside", it turns out that this is what it really means.
JASON, a person who seems to have been living in the cloud, is out of reality in their mouths, ALICE's sentence, "I just bring you back to reality, you are always too far away from reality", once she really put her in the air and away from the world. On the other hand, she pulled him back to the terrifying reality in the warmth and sweetness - she has a family.
It turned out that each other is just an episode of each other.
NATALIE is an episode of dismissing the company and an episode of JASON.
NATALIE's boyfriend is her episode.
ALICE is an episode of JASON.
Fired companies are episodes of fired people. A fired person is an episode of firing a company.
. . . . . . . . .
Just when NATALIE was going to shake JASON's personal beliefs about interpersonal relationships, love and marriage, I thought I would see the development of JASON and ALICE. In fact, JASON was really stimulated, but unfortunately it was pulled back to reality. , things are never one-sided, no matter how you imagine everything in the future, there are always surprises. As JASON said to NATANIE, "you know that moment when you look at somebody's eyes, you can feel them staring and you feel the whole world goes so queit." JASON said he wouldn't.
The screen pulls back to Natalie crying that his boyfriend dumped him with a text message, as if to satirize the computer dismissal system she designed. Humans are emotional animals with flesh and blood, not dead things that can be systematically managed. How can I go and end them across the screen?
She is still talking about him she thinks, her ideal him, she thinks they are going to get engaged, she fantasizes about everything, and then her boyfriend suddenly breaks up, she can't accept it, are we all in love with a fictional him? / what about her? We idealize a person too much, we love our own fantasies, and we end up disillusioning and blaming the other for their inadequacy.
NATALIE is like the epitome of us young people. Of course she has the right to be a top student, but she often gets cold eyes on its implementation. Of course, JASON, who faces a set of free theories, does not agree with it, because we also have our own. A set of theories, why are we not self-righteous?
Natalie's little self-righteousness may be funny, but it's also cute. What a terrible thing it would be if everyone lived in that way of taking everything for granted.
I suddenly remembered a sentence in "Breaking Ground: Adventures in Life and Architecture" that I watched before - cities are built by human dreams.
We have the right and the obligation to do whatever we want, hahaha.
Seeing that JASON finally became the seventh person who has accumulated 10 million miles, he couldn't be happy. It turns out that he is the same. It seems that he has been chasing and aiming for something, and he has achieved it, but it was not his imagination. The kind of feeling in his life is not so joyful, not so exciting. It turned out to be of little significance. It turned out that there was no one to share it, and it was difficult for him to be happy.
The last few minutes taught us that only those who love you and those you love are by your side, that no difficulty is insurmountable, and that we are the strongest with love.
We often ask about the meaning of life, the meaning of struggle, the meaning of work, the meaning of going to school, the meaning of having children, the meaning of marriage, the meaning of many, many things, and there is no standard answer. But it seems to be for the same reason - to experience love, to experience giving and receiving.
It turns out that nothing can escape love.
I recalled the theory of JASON at the beginning, his speech.
Packing too many things in a backpack is of course a heavy burden that cannot be moved; but if it is all hollowed out, the backpack will have no weight, and people will rise into the air, perhaps this weight is a sweet responsibility , is down-to-earth load-bearing. Maybe some weight is necessary.
However, from another perspective, I saw that the script seems to be using different people's different views on marriage and interpersonal views to present more things. It is a method of analogy. Saying this is not necessarily saying this. But in fact, marriage or not marriage is everyone's choice. It is indeed undeniable that each has its own wonderfulness and its own significance.
In fact, my point of view is somewhat similar to that of the male protagonist.
When I just finished watching it
, the "Beautiful Interlude" by ELVA sounded in my mind.
"Maybe it's the white cloud sky that is so blue and beautiful
because it's short and unintentional, but it's hard to forget..."
I believe
JASON will be the one who got fired. Beautiful interlude.
Everything and everything will always leave something behind, and it will pass without passing.
Maybe time will tell.
The feeling of filming makes me feel less like a movie, but like a life record, very real and natural.
(It's very confusing, a lot of feeling thoughts and the camera are constantly switching, without others, I just want to record some feelings.)
View more about Up in the Air reviews
