Is this point suitable as a gimmick? Bloomberg's status as a media mogul was made possible by the business and financial information that Bloomberg sold to the world. It is said that after Bloomberg entered politics, he deliberately kept his distance from Bloomberg, and no employees saw him again in the company.
Back in the film, at the end of the story, the male protagonist finally repents, claiming to give up the wrong pride that he relies on to maintain. Is he a hero? It should be considered that even if he took drugs and hangovers every day, he still maintained an accident-free flight experience for more than N hours until the forced landing caused by the plane failure. It can even be understood that this dude does not drink or take drugs, and it is absolutely impossible to have the aura of reversing flight to alleviate the problem of the plane falling rapidly. He himself thought so openly, and he had done it for a long time and it was fine, no matter what the aviation regulations were. Until the fellow survivors of the crew gently questioned, you have been drinking and taking drugs, although you have saved us...
In the ensuing aviation bureau investigation, the male protagonist is a little depressed, and I am not a hero, Can't you just let me go? Of course, airlines and industry associations naturally have to organize a set of procedures to save themselves from the economic losses caused by it, and then pull the male lead. The organizer almost told him clearly that after you survived the hearing, let go of the past and sing every night as you please. But the male protagonist finally chose to admit his mistake, why?
After a period of time, I learned from insiders that the boss behind the Bloomberg Throne project is not the former editor-in-chief of the industry newspaper, but a bureau seat here, and the actual investor is a giant in the local resources industry. As a result, this matter is a bit confusing. According to the sales lady, this project was developed to practice the ideal of journalism, so I will explain it in complete sentences as follows:
The bureau met a certain giant under the guise of a certain editor-in-chief. The editor-in-chief used the pretext of co-development, but actually flattered a bureau chief, the bureau chief knew this, you practice the ideal of journalism, you support the orderly development of the industry, Bloomberg Throne! good!
You swell, his erection, my throne!
Many times, wrong pride can be repented, but those so-called correct ugly cocoons are very firm. In the film, the hero finally chooses to admit his mistakes and choose to repent. It depends on the tolerance of religion, the protection of family, and what else? I suddenly can't think of it.
The ugly cocoon has been around for a long time, so I'm used to seeing it, do I see it as my own flesh?
View more about Flight reviews
