How to evaluate it, although part of the content reflected in the whole movie is worth thinking about, but more of it makes me think it doesn't make sense, or it's too trivial.
1. Let’s not talk about perpetual motion machines from a scientific point of view, this is just forcibly and reasonable. If the world can build this kind of railway, how many more cars can’t be built? You can build something like this, isn't it better to build a bunker? The country's resistance to disaster has been weakened excessively.
2. I remember saying that when the weather is getting warmer, you will know that the car has not been destroyed, so you can't solve those people, and then let the children in the lower car take turns to work there. Everyone maintains the train for one hour a day for a period of time until the temperature recovers. Stop working and get off life? Isn't this just like Thanos snapping his fingers and destroying half of it casually, how long does it take to restore the population as far as the human population is concerned? Does it make sense not to think about it?
3. Finally, the little girl and the little boy got out of the car and saw the polar bear. Are they planning to have one for lunch and the other for dinner? Even if the polar bears are not hungry, they are gone, and they are lucky to find a place to stay, lucky to find food, lucky to grow up without sickness or disaster, and hope to rely on two people to reproduce? Not afraid of consanguineous marriage?
4. It’s really dictatorial. Even if the car is destroyed, consider whether the people in the rest of the car are willing or not. If it’s up, everyone will be destroyed.
View more about Snowpiercer reviews
