I've never been able to keep up with the enthusiasm when watching movies, so today I just watched Liang Lao Tang's "Mission Impossible 3". After reading it, I don't have many impressions. I just feel that it is not as good as the first two films. It has neither the suspense of the first part nor the beauty of the second part, which is very mediocre. Since I didn't have any thoughts, I didn't plan to write my afterthought, so why do I plan to write it now? That's because I had an impression of how I felt about the film.
Comments on the Internet said that the film was introduced in the mainland, but certain abridgements were made. After watching the movie, I feel very puzzled. I don't see anything worth cutting out? Looking at the comments again, it turned out that some scenes such as dirty and messy alleys, such as coats, underwear, smelly socks and panties fluttering outside like red flags, such as clusters of people playing mahjong, were deleted. The reason is that these shots have affected the image of Shanghai, an international metropolis, so the scissors of the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television cut off these shots in a "sudden thunderstorm".
Netizens commented one after another, saying that people were thrown outside, but they blindfolded themselves, in order to bring out the idiom of hiding one's ears and stealing a bell. SARFT is stupid to the extreme. But I don't want to just make a conclusion like this. I want to explore why the SARFT made such a stupid mistake, because there is no love for no reason, there is no hate for no reason, and naturally there is no stupidity for no reason. There must be a stupid reason for that, I'll try to analyze it. The purpose is as Li Ao said, I not only call you a bastard, but I also want to prove that you are a bastard.
The Chinese government and the Chinese people have different perspectives on accepting foreign criticism. Generally speaking, the criticism that the Chinese government cannot bear focuses on the criticism of the government itself, while the ordinary people cannot bear the criticism of the concept of China and Chinese culture. In fact, this culture covers a wide range, basically everything you can think of. The Chinese people are very sensitive to this kind of criticism. Once they are discovered, they will be stamped with a seal of "humiliating China" without identification.
(I don’t know since when, the mentality of the Chinese began to evolve from the mainland thinking to the island country thinking, becoming more and more narrow, sensitive and fragile. I think this is because although geographically we are in a mainland position, ideologically , we have always been in a kind of isolated island status, coupled with the humiliation in modern history, the Chinese people have a distorted pride formed to protect the inferiority The mentality of the poor is often reflected in the extremely poor or extremely ugly people [just an objective analysis, no discrimination]. When this mentality appears in a group, the problem is more serious, and this pride is mainly reflected in the The glories of the past are wildly pursued and they cannot listen to any criticism and ridicule of their own culture, so that they cannot look at the problem realistically. This is more obvious to the Koreans than we are.)
It is a well-known fact that the Chinese people have a good face. . Good face, especially unwilling to expose one's shortcomings, especially unwilling to publicize family scandals. In those days, Zhang Yimou's series of international award-winning films were criticized by the Chinese people for begging for honor with domestic shame. This is the case for one's own people, and he is even more sensitive to the attitude of outsiders. Whenever there is negative news, they will attack them in the name of "humiliating China". Some are famous, and some are ridiculous. In a word, we can criticize, but you can't laugh at it.
This time, the "family scandal" has already been publicized. According to the meaning of the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television, there is no need to export it for domestic sales. Otherwise, wouldn't it be "humiliating" again? To cause dissatisfaction among the angry youths, clamoring for boycott of American products, and pacifying Hollywood, wouldn't it create international disputes, undermine stability and unity, and affect the building of a harmonious society? So it's better to hide your eyes and ears, and let it go. However, the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television underestimated the power of my country's piracy industry and the power of the Internet, and finally made a scene of "Pig Bajie looking in the mirror". Today, the state has stepped up efforts to rectify the audio-visual market and implemented the real-name system on the Internet. It can be said that measures are adapted to local conditions and targeted. Be respectful.
No more sarcasm, this time I really didn't see where the "humiliation" of these clips was (why did I use the word "again"). The film just wants to show a real Shanghai, a real China. Those deleted shots are precisely the original China that we are so familiar with, but those skyscrapers, which can make me think that they are anywhere. But I alone can't tell that this is China. The use of high-rise buildings everywhere to express China is just to express China's modernization, while ignoring the real state of China. This is the stupidity of the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television. As the old saying goes: "Knowing shame is close to courage." And the scissors of the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television show a kind of cowardice, and this kind of cowardice is a common mentality of the Chinese people.
Not daring to face yourself, refusing to criticize yourself, full of praise and self-praise, can only produce a bunch of false self-paralysis products. Fake domestic blockbusters, fake foreign blockbusters, fake harmonious society. Immersed in a falsehood, trying to win an Oscar, trying to win a Nobel, and trying to gain respect? This is a fool's dream, a false dream.
View more about Mission: Impossible III reviews
