Although the setting of the heroine this time is an ordinary person, the ordinary person and Tom ge really don't get along well. This movie is less handsome and more detailed, and the production method of human skin masks is made public for the first time. The plot is even more misleading. First, which of the blacks and whites is the traitor, and then the wife is pointed at the gun at the beginning, and three-quarters of the time is finally shot. According to the preference of "obvious things are easy to be reversed" in mainstream American movies, and if the black people are loyal to the motherland for a long time, the possibility of him being a traitor is very low. Then, when my wife was pointed at the gun at first, we didn't know it was his wife, so although he was crying so hard, at least my heart wasn't nervous for her. Therefore, although the plot is quite detailed and well-knitted, it is not very attractive to me. I've even watched this series in the past few days. It's already the third part, and there is no breakthrough performance in this genre. It's inevitable that I'm tired of aesthetics.
I think shooting a modern suspenseful action movie with blue bricks and white walls and alleys and corridors as the background should produce very interesting and refreshing effects for audiences from all over the world. But in a movie from 2006, the residents of this small town in the south of the Yangtze River are still wearing clothes from the 1980s, and it seems that the clothes of the protagonist are not in the same season, which is a bit embarrassing. It's a bit of a feeling of forcibly incorporating Eastern images into Western ideology.
View more about Mission: Impossible III reviews
