Then I realized that the two Sams must have had different looks and reactions to events that happened. A newcomer, pompous, perhaps in memory transfer, the emphasis is on a rebellious personality. The other has been exhausted for three years and the only thought is to wait for the long two weeks so that I can touch my wife again, see my daughter again, nothing else matters, play ping pong, watch TV, try Forget the idea that you might be a clone. So when watching, I didn't confuse the two Sams, one was a little decadent, the other was a clue, and finally the two found the truth together. Fortunately, in the end, the robot was humanized, or a scientist who pursued perfection wrote his program so detailed that he began to become delicate. After all, most of the tasks he received every day were from Sam, the center of the earth. It's too far and communication is too rough. So the robot participated in the redemption of the clone, but the ultimate fate of the clone is still in its own hands. I don't feel like I appreciate the plot that they hesitate to kill the third Sam, which is the direction of American blockbusters. Good people don't kill good people.
It wasn't until the end of the film that I realized that there was actually a lot of information in the film.
First, are clones human?
Obviously, this film tells everyone unequivocally that clones are also humans, even robots. How to balance technology and life, machine and nature, is not simply to cover up, use, or simply order and execute.
Second, where does the energy come from?
When everyone is paying attention to where there are still a lot of oil reserves, or there are rumors that the United States has a lot of oil hidden, there is only one truth, that is, the energy is slowly depleting. What Copenhagen, energy saving and resource saving, all are drop in the bucket, who can make this never-ending industrial development stagnate? Didn't the outer space tourism company threaten to cut the price of travel to $100 per person in the future? But obviously, for this film, this possibility is unlikely. Because if that's the case, why would a mining company want to cut costs by cloning a bunch of Sam rather than shipping workers?
Third, if it were you, would you really "serve" three years in prison?
If persuaded by Article 1, then clones should also be treated as human beings. Then their contracts should also be respected. We are used to believing in defending our company because it seems like the only way to survive. So everyone takes the contract as the lifeblood. The contract says that there will be endless employment, and people believe it. They think that as long as they are obedient and do not make mistakes, as long as they stick to their posts, there will be no layoffs. But people will have many unexpected events, such as birth, old age, sickness and death, such as depression and other mental injuries. The contract did not say that if there were any such accidents, the company would be responsible for medical expenses, transportation expenses, or mental injury expenses. Everyone, including clones, can only be slightly secured by fighting for their own interests.
Fourth, the essence of the capitalist remains unchanged, but the means are changing.
I have always believed that only a society in which the left and right are balanced can truly achieve harmony. Perhaps in the future trade unions or other organizations will have to take into account new issues based on new technology in order to truly compete with the power enforcers.
Fifth, you may need a friend like yourself.
For example, when you say the first half of the sentence, someone answers the second half, because you use the same brain and the same memory.
In the end, I found that although this film is not shocking, it can make you involuntarily think a lot in the calm narrative. So gave it four stars. . .
View more about Moon reviews
