The so-called facts and justice, forensic appraisal, and criminal lawyers’ professional conduct are so-so. How many years ago the thoughts about all forms of justice instilled by Ruihua in the criminal prosecution class have been affecting all the legal movies I watch. It is estimated that I should be a proponent of "unjust" things such as plea bargaining and inducement. As long as I am in compliance with the procedures, there will be no trouble. Therefore, even though I guessed at the beginning that Pa is definitely because of his relatives (I guessed it was his ex-wife or first love, in fact, it’s better to set the role as ex-wife or first-love girlfriend, etc.). This emotional frustration is frustrated. (XDDD) He has been hurt and spared no effort to "use the convenience of his position" to engage in the cause of inducement, and he must be a little guilty of affirming judicial justice and facts in the classroom. That's not the case. But so what? We understand this little common sense of American law, director, so don't delay business, do some exciting criminal investigation dramas, hunting dramas are also a success!
But no.
In the 88-minute movie, what I saw countless times before the next clue unfolded, Wen Wen Tuntun came up with a "let's go" old par, with no independent thinking ability and a hard-backed FBI officer. Course Mike, an angry young male student who was not solid in his studies and reasoned all the way, had no effect except for providing a mobile phone and a car and undressing him. The red-haired female student Kim had no effect. To say a few more words, this girl’s role as a junior in Hugh Grant and Sandra Bullock’s Two Weeks Notice made me very upset at first. I wanted to see if there is any potential to play with Lao Pa in close quarters. The facts have proved it. It is indeed a high-quality vase. In fact, the beauty closest to Lao Pa should be set as a remote-control killer. But in the end, this person was only hanged on a rope as a quasi-victim, which made me fidget and want to ask the director and let her follow. Lao Pa moved through the time of a movie, and did nothing except to cause trouble, talk to Lao Pa, and be confided. He didn't even set up a fancy drama to attract a little male audience (I blushed myself when I thought of this. After thinking about it, I think I am an innocent female audience because I think of this kind of antidote for a movie that cannot mention Liu Adou's style. It is really a stain in the history of movie watching). What is the role of this role? ? Simply!
There are also many unreasonable plots: the reason for leaking the tapes of Lao Pa’s sister is that the lesbian secretary neglected her duty when she was in the office with the female killer xxoo. It’s deliberately fabricated by the relationship, but it’s really lesbian, it’s too humorous); the first half of the mysterious Kim’s ex-husband actually said a line and it was ended (then why waste so much Pretending to be cool flashback camera, isn't this insulting Pa's reasoning ability); Pa, you must secretly remove the cartridge of Kim's pistol and return it to her before she hasn't noticed or hurt anyone? What's the point? Even if Kim is the murderer, if in the end you meet each other in short-handedness and draw your pistols in a cool confrontation, would you say something like this sb line: "The bullets were removed, what are you gonna do now, huh?" To bear with it, Lao Pa actually spent 5 minutes telling Kim about the murder of my old girl in a taxi that was exchanged for 100 bucks when he was in a hurry, which made me wait for the dull audience to realize "Oh, 88 minutes." It was the time he was tortured when his little sister was killed, no wonder the murderer now treats him like this!" To be honest, this is the worst of the movies with digital titles!
In fact, based on my experience with CSI and Criminal Minds, the reasoning process of this case can be as follows:
1. Because John Forster was murdered with the same criminal tactics before his sentence, it is very likely that Forster was manipulated in prison to make the murderer still at large. (The movie focused on this issue for 10 minutes, and then a bunch of FBI and DA actually got off work);
2. Next, investigate all the people associated with Forster: visitors, relatives, friends, lawyers, Prison guards, sympathetic reporters, etc. After such a comparison check, the female lawyer who visited him will come out;
3. On the other hand, at the crime scene where schoolgirls and prostitutes were killed, it is time for Seattle CSI agents to work. If they found Lao Pa’s DNA and fingerprints, they should quickly find Lao Pa and detain him for interrogation. Chang Lao Pa was hunted down as a murderer while investigating the truth in order to prove his innocence. What a show!
4. After the words '77 minutes left' appeared on the slide in the classroom, the murderer must be in the classroom, and then escaped while evacuating, too pediatric! At this time, the FBI should ask all the people in the classroom to interrogate one by one, so that at least the girl named Laura can be found to be suspicious. Knock on the keyboard to check a few databases, and the murderer caught it)
In short, this film is not as good as "Seven Deadly Sins" in terms of reasoning and depth, and not as good as "Sniper Phone Booth" in terms of reasoning and suspense—that's definitely a certainty, David What level of boss are Vinci and Joschumacher-far less exciting than any episode of CSI.
It's like a pot of raw rice, not tepid, not relaxing.
It is said that Lao Pa and De Niro collaborated again on "Justice Killing" which was also filmed by this director, but fortunately I didn't watch it.
View more about 88 Minutes reviews
