It's okay to watch it, what's with him?

Conrad 2022-04-22 07:01:04

Americans are really good at making money, and the movie "2012" was re-released under the banner of "3D" just over a month before the end of the world predicted by the Mayans. Pulled by my roommate, I reluctantly went to the theater to watch it again. To be honest, in addition to the three-dimensional subtitles, 3D did not add more realism to the already shocking picture. However, watching it again when the "Doomsday" is coming, it still feels different from watching it three years ago.
I like disaster films very much. How can I say that disasters torture human nature. In daily life, everyone wears various masks for various purposes, to disguise themselves and to please others. When disaster strikes, the true selves hidden behind the mask are revealed. In the face of disasters, they are usually submissive, and the humble little staff may become righteous and dignified, sacrificing themselves for others, while those politicians who usually talk eloquently and seem righteous and awe-inspiring may run faster than anyone else... . The good and the evil of human nature are real here. For example, in the movie "Titanic", what moved me the most was not the earth-shattering love between Jack and Rose, but when the Titanic was about to sink, those old men who voluntarily gave up boarding the escape ship in order to give women and children a chance to live. The gentlemen, the musicians who played music to the last minute to appease the passengers, the priest who prayed for those who could not escape. If Jack and Rose show the poignant love between men and women, then what they show is the beauty of human nature and the great love in the world.
In contrast, "2012" was a disappointment in this regard. Roland Emmerich seems to only focus on working hard on special effects, but the plot lacks new ideas, and he is still taking the old road of "Independence Day" in 1996. On the excavation of human nature, the point is to stop, interspersed with humorous dialogue to ease the nervous nerves of the audience after the shock, the only bright spot is probably the addition of a large number of Chinese elements, of course, this can also be understood as a way to enter the Chinese market. Business strategy...in a word it's all about the box office.
But as a standard Hollywood blockbuster, all this seems to be understandable. Just like what my roommate said, it's fine to watch it, who cares?
Indeed, just look cool. Just like "The Expendables", no one wants to think about what is hidden under the strong pectoralis major, as long as you can see the blood vessels, it is enough.

View more about 2012 reviews

Extended Reading
  • Kelli 2022-03-23 09:01:22

    The Mayan calendar believes that after December 21, 2012, it is the beginning of a new century, but it is Western thinking that regards this day as the end. Roland Emmerich combined the two viewpoints with a modest attitude and added the legend of Noah's Ark in the "Bible Revelation" to make the whole story full of credibility. The spectacle that cost 200 million US dollars to build is the real protagonist of "2012", even if 3D is not used, it can make people feel on the scene

  • Kevon 2022-03-22 09:01:18

    This film tells us that as long as the project is done by the Chinese, there must be a back door to go!

2012 quotes

  • Carl Anheuser: Where the hell is President Wilson!

    Sally - President's Secretary: He's praying, sir, and under these circumstances that's not such a bad idea.

  • Gordon Silberman: Honey, why don't we make a baby?

    Kate Curtis: We're not making a baby in the supermarket!