2012 Eschatology originated from the Mayan civilization, which was exterminated by the Spanish colonists. The race was again brought to the forefront by the worship of death. The Mayans are most famous for astronomy, and it is said that they can calculate the orbit of the XX ball with an error of less than 0.XX seconds. So many people see the end of the Mayan calendar in 2012 as the end of the world. One question is whether a mathematician who can extrapolate pi to the maximum number of decimal places must be able to solve the string theory equations? You Mayans are at best a traffic controller. If you want to say that the two big waterwheels of the earth will one day merge with the sun when they run like this, then I am a little uneasy. You simply give up, and future generations start to guess: Is the transportation system about to collapse? In contrast, I think Da Liu is more logical. "Three-Body Problem" mentions a sharpshooter hypothesis: a sharpshooter practicing shooting can accurately punch a hole every 20 meters on the target, and there is a kind of wisdom living on the target. Two-dimensional creatures, among which the leading scientists have discovered a great theory after long-term observations: the universe we live in has a black hole every 20 light-years. Therefore, the so-called annihilation of the first four solar ages (flood, wind disaster, sky fire, fire and rain) of the Mayan civilization can also be explained in this way: the earth is a big Rubik’s cube, a high-dimensional intelligent body is playing in the hand, first accidentally put the Rubik’s cube It fell into the footbath, then it was dried in front of the fan, then dried on the stove, then lit a cigarette, played with sparks, and floated onto the Rubik's Cube.
Roland Emmerich almost opened a disaster-themed party on the earth in "2012", lava, volcanoes, earthquakes, floods... Never has a film destroyed the earth so completely, subverting the laws of all disaster films: human beings have nowhere to escape form, cannot escape. In the past disaster films, such as "The Sinking of Japan", I wrote a "disaster escape code" after watching it:
1. Patriots have eternal life;
2. Disasters are likely to be mixed with the underworld, and you will be notified in advance before fighting with you. You;
3. Don't live in a big city, the more remote the better, all disasters will not know the way to Niuwei Township;
4. What kind of money comes, hard currency is not important, food is the first;
5. Power is more important than money, so try to be a friend of politicians;
6. Don't be a hero, you will die, no matter if you are a genius or a sportsman. However, most of the disability allowances are for the beauties.
7. If you want to be the relatives of the male protagonist, there is a certain risk factor, because it is very likely that your sacrifice will be exchanged for the male protagonist's elbow to turn out;
8. It is best When you are the heroine, you can be unscrupulous. You can beat or scold you, be tender, or betray your relatives and leave... Rest assured, you are the safest.
In this way, it seems that "2012" is not completely subverted, at least the second article falls into the rut. I always think that human beings will be destroyed in their own hands, and they will demand and demand from the earth without restraint. The living environment of the earth is getting worse, and the land suitable for human existence is becoming less and less. But "2012" still gave mankind a time-limited full-door copying. However, the saving grace is that it leads to two thoughts: what should we do when the end comes? If given the chance, who should live? Roland Emmerich's explanation for these two issues is: 1. rely on the party and the government; 2. let the leadership decide.
Human beings have always regarded themselves as too high, even more so than others. The doomsday is coming, what do you rely on in the first place? luck! The winged queen will choose a suitable habitat, reproduce and lead the overall planning. The water came, and the queen's initial wise decision came into play: the nest was high, so you could sit back and relax. One day, a little worker ant smelled the dampness in the air, and a heavy rain was coming. Let's move, and run to the top of the mountain with your family and mouth. Whoever is lucky and has good legs and feet will be able to escape. Of course, the pampered pot-bellied queen ant will also have personal guards to resist. After that, under luck, the ants were equal. It is not a disaster for the queen to die midway, and naturally there will be hormones to stimulate other successors to mutate into queens. The lucky ants that are washed away by the current on the branches and leaves may establish a new home thousands of miles away from home.
So who at the end of the day deserves more chances to live? Go to TM and let the leader go first. Following the leader may be an ark or a collective coffin. I am afraid that there will be no leader, and whoever has the best ability to survive should get more opportunities, and the reproduction of civilization, 10 members of the political bureau are not equal to a pot-bellied village woman who can give birth and support. "2012" still does not have a good grasp of the human mentality of the disaster. In fact, in my opinion, it can refer to Sun Shiyuan's novel "The Gunner in Western Liaoning" that I have read before. Gunner's vendetta, if you want to kill the family, you will definitely hunt down all the relatives of the enemy, even the infant child. The losers will also keep women and children if they are left alive for the enemy to decide for themselves.
It is said that Roland Emmerich will direct "2013" after "2012", so don't wait for everything under the wise decision of the leader. The conjecture about the post-apocalypse is to reinvent the wheel and return to the primitive society. What industries, electronics, and information industries can only be used as theoretical foundations to accelerate the progress of civilization. At the very least, planting, animal husbandry, and minerals must undergo primitive accumulation, right? This is like a group of children making sand sculptures by the sea. At first, they may be used to being led by the child king, who will make overall planning on where to choose the site, who will dig trenches, who will build sand, and who will review and propose improvements. After the small kingdom is completed, the child king is the temporary king, but a big tide is coming... Who will listen to you next? The children who used to dig trenches and build sand have more experience and more right to speak.
So my apocalyptic guess is this: With floods destroying crops and livestock, fishing will flourish again, and the first generation of humans will be led by surviving, survivable seafarers. At the same time, due to population downsizing, human beings have returned to the worship of reproduction, and the matrilineal society has returned. Religious forces re-dominated the surviving human beings, and politics and religion were unified, and the religious leaders among them would be the descendants of the doctors who survived the Great Judgment, and the mass base would be consolidated after the witch doctor period. Then came the cold weapons, and the hunters took power. After that, refer to the existing civilization process.
So guys, are you ready for the end of the world? Hurry up and save your character and exercise.
View more about 2012 reviews
