I saw this movie at GG yesterday and it wasn't as good as I expected. . .
The plot is too thin and old-fashioned, and it all depends on stimulating the senses, but when it comes to visual stimulation, it can't compare with Kubrick, which makes people have no imagination - those car models are so dirty... I checked it out It's still ~Khan~ in 2001,
but this subject is worth mentioning. I haven't seen anything similar before, but it makes me feel fresh. But a lot of times, it's vulgar~ For example, racing with the train for speed... It's really pediatric.
Overall feeling:
1. Silly and bold. Not only the characters, but even the entire story was made up without a brain. Not to elaborate.
2, fake cool. Gorgeous, muscular men, canvas shoes, the whole style is not uniform, and he throws a few crazy words at every turn, how can he be like a kid on the street.
3. Ambiguous. In fact, one of the questions I am most concerned about is, so many people buy the best parts, where does the money come from? Do so many cars rely on robbery? ("I despise you robbers, you have no technical skills at all...") If you try to explore the living conditions of American teenagers (as some commentators say), then the survival basis of this group cannot be ignored. The narrative of this film is very vague, or rather, there are quite a few loopholes.
In any case, what exists is reasonable, and a certain film must have its value for a certain group of people. The second male has a good voice and a hot girl with a good figure. In addition, I also like to see the decorations on the car...
Not to mention "human beings have the original impulse to pursue speed", it is good to take this film for an impulse, hehe .
View more about The Fast and the Furious reviews
