We always have many, many ways to treat history. We always like to label history with the title of the grand view of history, and we always abuse the grand view of history time and time again. In the end, how many years does it take for a piece of history to clean up the dross, uncover the fog, and let us judge him more simply and accurately. We judged the history of the Qing Dynasty in the Republic of China, and judged the old democracy after 1949, and 49 years have passed. 60 years, but now we can't judge these 60 years, yes, maybe you will say, this "dynasty" has not passed, can't make any judgment, we are still continuing to write this history.
Is it true that you can only judge your own history when you change dynasties, and you can only judge when you can no longer hear what others say about yourself. I suddenly feel that people are really cowardly. In my opinion, we just want to beautify this history. "I'm too weak to make up for my mistakes", we are too weak to make up for our mistakes, we try to do more "deeds" in the hope that a monument will be built for us in the future.
However, just like 49 years, our history books are filled with the names of many more people, and we know many "great people" and many "big events", but these only exist in the history books, without any monuments is built for them.
The real monuments in history are dedicated only to those who are real, not masks.
View more about The Lives of Others reviews
