The setting of the movie is actually pretty good. Life is money and everything is bought with time. The rich live forever, the poor can only live day by day, earn a little and live a little. But flaws also exist. If live day by day, where would I have the leisure to spend 3 minutes of my remaining 24 hours buying coffee? If it takes an hour to buy a bus ticket to go home, how dare I save money with only one and a half hours left for the bus ride? However, the characters in the movie are all fearless and go ahead. A setting that was finally relatively novel also slowly ruined the plot of Silly 13.
The male protagonist's mother died shortly after the beginning of the film. The director set up a sensational plot where the male protagonist and the mother who only had more than ten seconds of life run towards each other, but in the end, the mother still didn't have enough time, so she died in the arms of the male protagonist. So the male protagonist suddenly woke up and decided to change the world. He discovered that in order not to let people live forever, the government can only continuously improve the setting of living cause, so that the poor earn less and less time, so they can only "naturally die". So he decided to change the world by stealing all the time of the rich and giving it to the poor, so that everyone can live happily together. Of course, during the execution of the plan, the rebellious daughter of the wealthy was abducted to satisfy the audience's thirst for handsome boys and beautiful girls. The rebellious young woman took her lover to rob her father's bank without hesitation. Not to mention how naive and naive the way the handsome guy wants to save the world, in such a highly developed world where life can be calculated in time and can be accessed, the bank relies on two male and female masters, holding two pistols, saying Grab it? Towards the end, the director also set up a plot where the male and female protagonists run away from each other to echo the title, and finally this time the female protagonist did not die in the male protagonist's arms. Going back to the ending mentioned at the beginning, such a big bank has a large amount of time that is closely related to the lives of many people, and there is no surveillance camera around? Just let the hero and heroine jump up so happily?
There are many other silly places in the film, such as the inexplicable death of the male protagonist friend and the police, so I will not describe them one by one. However, I admired the heroine who was wearing a few inches of high stiletto heels and was still flying on various planes as light as a swallow.
Anyway, I hope that the next time Timberlake handsome guy acts in a movie, look at the script.
View more about In Time reviews
