This time, I have lost my love for Aniston, but I have more admiration for Jim Carrey. He alone supported the whole film. A good comedian isn't just because of a good script, it's the catalyst for his superb acting. Each of his exaggerated body language and free facial expressions are deeply branded with his unique brand, which no one else can imitate. At first I just thought, "Comedian = nonsensical embarrassment + exaggerated action", but it is not. The real deep comedy is that the actor interprets every subtext of the script, but it is replaced by dramatic language. Having said that, the god played by the old actor Morgan Freeman appears every time in a whole floor of empty white paint, dressed as a cleaner, and disappears in the bright light of "Clap on, clap off." In, this, does not indicate something? I believe that each audience has their own interpretation, which is self-evident.
Aniston doesn't have a lot of scenes in it, and the vase still feels inseparable. The sweetheart "Rachel" that once moved my heart has an old face. Although the outline has not changed, it is still as sweet, but it is no match for the quietly wrinkled skin and the crow's feet that gradually creep up on the brow. Goodbye, former goddess, from "Fake God", "Love Is Undefended" to "He Doesn't Love You That Much", I can't see the progress of your acting, only the iconic smile is still there, it's time to stop appreciating.
After thinking about it, I actually love the movies of the 1990s. Is it related to the strange similarity between Europe and the United States at that time and China today, in terms of economic level, family income, living habits, and home furnishings? I believe this is part of the answer.
At the end, the blue sky and white clouds that cannot be escaped are full of joy, and every street is full of joy. That is Jim Carrey's movies, from "The Detective Plane" to "The World of Truman", and this one, the same you, no. change ending.
View more about Bruce Almighty reviews