As the title says, my analysis is extremely irresponsible. It only represents my personal opinion. I just want to talk about my understanding. If you think I am over-interpreting it, I am over-interpreting it, because understanding is a subjective thing. You I want to understand this way, I want to understand it so much, and I can't argue who is right and who is wrong. I respect your opinion, and please be merciful and do not like it. Thank you.
This movie is really smart. It is similar to Truman's world. What we see is not as simple as sacrificing the ancient evil spirits. What we see is the audience. In this era of entertainment to death, everything is just In order to make the audience happy, this movie is a bit of a drama. The cabin we see is like a movie set, and the people in the laboratory are just workers in the film industry. They have scene scheduling and atmosphere rendering. , the two directors (the two who sat in the control room and controlled everything), the mother of the opposite sex that I saw later was like an investor, no matter what you shoot, as long as you can make money, how can you make money? ? The audience can shoot whatever they like, so they don't care what monsters the directors and actors choose. As long as the ancient gods (audience) buy it, they won't show up. Audiences at least want to see a horror movie that suits their interests. This year, Japanese horror movies are not good, and disaster movie audiences are not buying it. The task of making horror movies that audiences like naturally falls on the Americans. What do viewers like to watch? A horror movie that can no longer be vulgar, everything has to follow a routine, a hut in the woods isolated from the world, five people with different personalities, the strange old man who warned them in the middle of the journey, and even the monsters appear one after the other. The same monsters for years. As we all know, people who are too dissolute in horror films must die first, and the purest heroine must persist to the end, whether she is dead or alive in the end. But if you look closely, you will find that these people are not like they are in the wooden house in real life. When they came to the wooden house, they found their classic roles in horror movies. In other words, they came to the place with cameras (here I It is understood that when the audience can watch) they become what the audience wants to see most for the audience behind the camera. But there is a problem in the middle. Some actors have their own ideas. They don't want to listen to the command of the filmmaker behind the scenes (poisonous insects). They have their own ideas. They don't want their parents to feel that they are useless after seeing it. I think one of the most ironic points in this movie is that even if there are so many moths in the middle, as long as the movie has a stereotypical ending, the audience will still buy it (the ancient god will still not wake up), and everything will be fine until Next year, there will be another horror movie industrial product that meets the audience's aesthetics, and it will always be peaceful and prosperous.
View more about The Cabin in the Woods reviews
